Hegeman J, Honegger F, Kupper M, Allum J H J
Department of ORL, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
J Vestib Res. 2005;15(2):109-17.
We investigated whether long-term bilateral vestibular loss subjects could combine auditory biofeedback of trunk sway with their remaining natural sensory inputs on balance to provide an improved control of trunk sway. A successful integration of natural and artificial signals would provide a basis for a balance prosthesis.
Trunk sway of 6 bilateral peripheral vestibular loss subjects (BVL) was recorded using either angular position- or velocity-based auditory feedback or no feedback during stance and gait tasks. Roll and pitch trunk movements were recorded with angular velocity transducers mounted just above the waist and feedback without a delay to 4 loudspeakers placed at the left, right, front and rear borders of the 5 m long by 4 m wide test environment. The two types of auditory feedback or no feedback were provided to the subjects in random order. In the feedback modes, sway greater than a preset angle (ca. 0.5 deg) or velocity (ca. 3 deg/s) thresholds caused a tone to be emitted from the speaker towards which the subject moved. The tone volume increased with increasing angle or angular velocity amplitude.
For all stance tasks BVL subjects without auditory feedback had a significantly different balance control with respect to that of normal controls. BVL sway values eyes open on a normal surface were reduced with auditory feedback with the greatest reductions in the roll plane. Specifically for the task of standing on 1 leg eyes open with position-auditory- feedback, amplitudes of pitch and roll angles and angular velocities were indistinguishable from those of normal controls. Sway during stance tasks on foam with eyes closed showed no improvement with feedback, remaining greater than normal. For some gait tasks there was a decrease in trunk sway with velocity feedback.
These initial results indicate that subjects with vestibular loss could incorporate the auditory prosthetic sensory information into their balance commands, particularly in the roll plane if the balance task is performed with eyes open. Position information appears more useful than velocity information in reducing trunk sway during stance tasks. Future work will need to determine the effect of a training time on the improvement in balance control using such a prosthetic device and the ideal position and velocity auditory feedback combination.
我们研究了长期双侧前庭丧失的受试者是否能够将躯干摆动的听觉生物反馈与他们剩余的关于平衡的自然感觉输入相结合,以更好地控制躯干摆动。自然信号和人工信号的成功整合将为平衡假体提供基础。
在站立和步态任务期间,使用基于角度位置或速度的听觉反馈或无反馈,记录6名双侧外周前庭丧失受试者(BVL)的躯干摆动。使用安装在腰部上方的角速度传感器记录横滚和俯仰躯干运动,并将无延迟的反馈发送到放置在5米长、4米宽测试环境的左、右、前、后边界的4个扬声器。以随机顺序向受试者提供两种类型的听觉反馈或无反馈。在反馈模式下,摆动大于预设角度(约0.5度)或速度(约3度/秒)阈值会导致朝着受试者移动方向的扬声器发出音调。音调音量随着角度或角速度幅度的增加而增加。
对于所有站立任务,没有听觉反馈的BVL受试者与正常对照组相比,平衡控制有显著差异。在正常表面上睁眼时,BVL的摆动值通过听觉反馈降低,在横滚平面上降低幅度最大。具体而言,对于单腿站立睁眼并使用位置听觉反馈的任务,俯仰和横滚角度及角速度的幅度与正常对照组无差异。闭眼在泡沫上进行站立任务时的摆动,反馈后没有改善,仍大于正常水平。对于一些步态任务,速度反馈使躯干摆动减少。
这些初步结果表明,前庭丧失的受试者可以将听觉假体感觉信息纳入其平衡指令中,特别是在睁眼执行平衡任务时的横滚平面。在站立任务中,位置信息在减少躯干摆动方面似乎比速度信息更有用。未来的工作需要确定训练时间对使用这种假体装置改善平衡控制的影响,以及理想的位置和速度听觉反馈组合。