Suppr超能文献

第一部分. 全科医生与专科医生的关系。

Part I. General practitioner-specialist relationship.

作者信息

Piterman L, Koritsas S

机构信息

Department of General Practice, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2005 Jul;35(7):430-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00855.x.

Abstract

This article is the first of a two-part series that seeks to explore the relationship and interaction between general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists. A historical account of the medical profession is given, beginning from the tripartite division (i.e. the physicians, surgeons or barbers and the apothecaries), the Apothecaries Act of 1815, and the Medical Act of 1858. An account is also given of factors that exacerbated the division and friction between GPs and specialists, and how general practice developed in Australia. The role of the GP is stated as the provision of primary care, preventive care, patient-centred care, continuing care, comprehensive care, and community-based care to individuals and their families. The role of the specialists on the other hand is that of a consultant to advise GPs who carry on the management after the patient leaves the specialist. The dynamics of the GP-specialist relationship are discussed in relation to power, interdependence, morale, public image, education and training, and support from the Colleges, and we conclude by discussing the importance of collaboration between professions.

摘要

本文是一个两部分系列文章中的第一篇,旨在探讨全科医生(GP)与医学专家之间的关系及互动。文章给出了医学职业的历史叙述,从三方划分(即内科医生、外科医生或理发师以及药剂师)、1815年的《药剂师法案》和1858年的《医疗法案》开始。还阐述了加剧全科医生与专家之间分歧和摩擦的因素,以及澳大利亚全科医疗的发展情况。全科医生的角色被表述为向个人及其家庭提供初级保健、预防保健、以患者为中心的保健、持续保健、综合保健和基于社区的保健。另一方面,专家的角色是作为顾问,为在患者离开专家后继续进行管理的全科医生提供建议。文章从权力、相互依存、士气、公众形象、教育与培训以及来自各学院的支持等方面讨论了全科医生与专家关系的动态变化,最后我们讨论了专业间合作的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验