Ree Melissa J, Harvey Allison G, Blake Rachel, Tang Nicole K Y, Shawe-Taylor Metka
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK.
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Aug;43(8):985-98. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.07.003.
The attempted control of intrusive, uncontrollable thoughts has been implicated in the maintenance of a range of psychological disorders. The current paper describes the refinement of the Thought Control Questionnaire Insomnia (TCQI; Behav. Cogn. Psychoth. 29 (2001)) through its administration to a sample (n=385) including good sleepers and individuals with insomnia. Several items with poor psychometric properties were discarded, resulting in a 35-item revised TCQI. Factor analysis revealed six factors; aggressive suppression, cognitive distraction, reappraisal, social avoidance, behavioural distraction, and worry. The attempted management of unwanted thoughts was compared across individuals with insomnia and good sleepers, and the impact of these strategies on sleep quality, anxiety and depression was investigated. With the exception of cognitive distraction, individuals with insomnia, relative to good sleepers, more frequently used every thought control strategy. The strategies of aggressive suppression and worry, in particular, appeared to be unhelpful, with the use of these strategies predicting sleep impairment, anxiety and depression. The strategy of cognitive distraction appeared to be helpful, with the use of this strategy predicting better sleep quality.
对侵入性、无法控制的想法进行控制的尝试与一系列心理障碍的维持有关。本文描述了对失眠思维控制问卷(TCQI;行为认知心理治疗29 (2001))的改进,通过对一个样本(n = 385)进行施测,该样本包括睡眠良好者和失眠个体。几个心理测量特性较差的项目被舍弃,从而得到了一个35项的修订版TCQI。因素分析揭示了六个因素:攻击性抑制、认知分心、重新评价、社交回避、行为分心和担忧。对失眠个体和睡眠良好者在对 unwanted thoughts 的管理尝试方面进行了比较,并研究了这些策略对睡眠质量、焦虑和抑郁的影响。除了认知分心外,相对于睡眠良好者,失眠个体更频繁地使用每种思维控制策略。特别是攻击性抑制和担忧策略似乎并无帮助,使用这些策略预示着睡眠障碍、焦虑和抑郁。认知分心策略似乎是有帮助的,使用该策略预示着更好的睡眠质量。