Outcomes for men younger than 50 years undergoing radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the surgical outcomes after radical prostatectomy between men younger than 50 years and men 50 years old or older.

METHODS

Between October 1, 2000 and December 31, 2003, 790 men underwent open radical retropubic prostatectomy by a single surgeon. The intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters were recorded in real time and entered into a database. The outcomes were compared for 66 men younger than 50 years of age (group 1) versus 724 men who were 50 years old or older (group 2).

RESULTS

The pathologic stage, percentage of cancer in the surgical specimen, positive surgical margin rate, and Gleason score were not significantly different among the two age groups. No significant difference was found in the risk factors for prostate cancer between groups 1 and 2 (33.3% versus 28.9%, respectively; P = 0.63). The operative complications were exceedingly low in both groups. Of the men in groups 1 and 2, 93.3% and 97.1% achieved continence, respectively (P = 0.26). Of the potent men at baseline who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy, 100% of men in group 1 versus 81.4% in group 2 (P = 0.02) were having erections adequate for intercourse with or without phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors or intracavernous injection therapy, as determined by direct patient interview. Of the men who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, 78.3% of group 1 versus 62.6% of group 2 (P = 0.14) were potent with or without phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative and pathologic predictors of organ-confined disease and biochemical recurrence were similar in both age groups. The results of this study have demonstrated that radical retropubic prostatectomy can be performed with good results and low complication rates in men with localized prostate cancer who are younger than 50 years of age.