In defence of Roy Meadow.
作者信息
Horton Richard
机构信息
The Lancet, London NW1 7BY, UK.
出版信息
Lancet. 2005;366(9479):3-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66798-0.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
In defence of Roy Meadow.
Lancet. 2005;366(9479):3-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66798-0.
2
Roy Meadow.
Lancet. 2005;366(9484):451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67051-1.
3
Roy Meadow.
Lancet. 2005;366(9484):449-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67048-1.
4
A dismal and dangerous verdict against Roy Meadow.
Lancet. 2005;366(9482):277-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66965-6.
5
Insightlessness and an unscientific forensic expert.
J Law Med. 2006 Nov;14(2):176-81.
6
Roy Meadow.
Lancet. 2005;366(9484):450. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67049-3.
7
David Southall: anatomy of a wrecked career.
BMJ. 2012 May 16;344:e3377. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3377.
8
Unsafe conviction rejected in Roy Meadow expert witness case.
BMJ. 2005 Jul 30;331(7511):253. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7511.253-a.
9
The loneliness of the expert witness. General Medical Council v. Meadow.
Med Law Rev. 2007 Spring;15(1):116-25. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwl022. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
10
Doctor who gave expert advice in "shaken baby" cases is struck off.
BMJ. 2016 Mar 22;352:i1682. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1682.
Zotero 插件