Tartaglia Alexander, McMahon Brian T, West Steven L, Belongia Lisa
Program in Patient Counseling, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, 23298, USA.
Work. 2005;25(1):57-65.
Using the Integrated Mission System of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the employment discrimination experience of Americans with disfigurement is documented. Key dimensions of workplace discrimination involving Americans with disfigurement and persons with missing limbs are compared and contrasted. Specifically, the researchers examine demographic characteristics of Charging Parties; the industry designation, location and size of Respondents/employers; the discrimination Issue (i.e., type of adverse action) alleged to occur; and the legal outcome or Resolution of these allegations. Charging Parties with disfigurement who are female or between 30 and 39 years of age are more likely to encounter employment discrimination than their counterparts with missing limbs. Harassment and Non-wage Benefits are the Issues that emerge in higher proportion. Allegations derived from persons with disfigurement are more common in among mid-size employers, those located in the South, or those in Retail or Service industries. Following investigation, allegations derived from persons with disfigurement are less likely to have Merit Resolutions than those brought by Charging Parties with missing limbs.
利用平等就业机会委员会的综合任务系统,记录了有容貌缺陷的美国人的就业歧视经历。对涉及有容貌缺陷的美国人和肢体缺失者的职场歧视的关键维度进行了比较和对比。具体而言,研究人员考察了投诉方的人口统计学特征;被告/雇主的行业类别、地点和规模;据称发生的歧视问题(即不利行动的类型);以及这些指控的法律结果或解决方案。有容貌缺陷的女性投诉方或年龄在30至39岁之间的投诉方比肢体缺失的同行更有可能遭遇就业歧视。骚扰和非工资福利是出现比例较高的问题。有容貌缺陷者提出的指控在中型雇主、位于南方的雇主或零售或服务行业的雇主中更为常见。经过调查,有容貌缺陷者提出的指控比肢体缺失的投诉方提出的指控更不太可能得到有理有据的解决方案。