Lacey S, Pitt Ford T R, Watson T F, Sherriff M
Department of Biomaterials and Conservative Dentistry, GKT Dental Institute, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, London, UK.
Int Endod J. 2005 Aug;38(8):499-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00953.x.
To test the hypothesis that there would be no statistically significant difference in viscosity-related measures of endodontic sealers or change in these with strain rate, internal diameter or powder : liquid ratio in a capillary system.
Materials used were Apexit, Tubliseal EWT, Grossman's sealer and Ketac-endo. Viscosity-related measures were tested in a two-plate test, and in a capillary rheometer. The mean values (n = 12) for thickness and diameter of material formed between two glass plates were tested with one-way analysis of variance. Pressure was applied to a capillary rheometer at strain rates 5 and 10 mm min(-1) in tubes of internal diameter 0.6 and 1.2 mm.
Tubliseal EWT had a thinner film thickness than the other sealers (alpha = 0.05). The difference in diameter between Tubliseal EWT and the other sealers was significant apart from Apexit. Increased strain rate gave a significant increase (alpha = 0.05) in the flow of all sealers. Narrower tubes produced increased velocity, which was significant for all sealers, and reduced volumetric flow, which was significant for all sealers except Grossman's 2 : 1 (Wilcoxon signed rank test). Reduction in powder : liquid ratio of Grossman's significantly increased flow in narrow tubes and at higher strain rate (Mann-Whitney test).
There was a significant difference between the flow of Tubliseal EWT and the other sealers tested in the two-plate test; capillary flow was affected by sealer, internal diameter, strain rate and powder : liquid ratio. The null hypotheses were rejected.
验证如下假设,即在毛细管系统中,根管封闭剂的粘度相关指标以及这些指标随应变速率、内径或粉液比的变化不存在统计学上的显著差异。
使用的材料有Apexit、Tubliseal EWT、格罗斯曼封闭剂和Ketac-endo。在双平板试验和毛细管流变仪中测试粘度相关指标。对两块玻璃板之间形成的材料的厚度和直径的平均值(n = 12)进行单因素方差分析。在内径为0.6和1.2 mm的管中,以5和10 mm·min⁻¹的应变速率对毛细管流变仪施加压力。
Tubliseal EWT的薄膜厚度比其他封闭剂薄(α = 0.05)。除Apexit外,Tubliseal EWT与其他封闭剂之间的直径差异显著。应变速率增加使所有封闭剂的流动性显著增加(α = 0.05)。管径变窄使流速增加,这对所有封闭剂都显著,而体积流量降低,这对除格罗斯曼2:1之外的所有封闭剂都显著(威尔科克森符号秩检验)。格罗斯曼封闭剂粉液比降低显著增加了细管中以及较高应变速率下的流动性(曼-惠特尼检验)。
在双平板试验中,Tubliseal EWT与其他受试封闭剂的流动性存在显著差异;毛细管流动受封闭剂、内径、应变速率和粉液比的影响。原假设被拒绝。