Varangot Mario, Barrios Enrique, Sóñora Cecilia, Aizen Bernardo, Pressa Carlos, Estrugo Roberto, Lavigna Raúl, Musé Ignacio, Osinaga Eduardo, Berois Nora
Servicio de Oncología Clínica, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Laboratorio de Oncología Básica, Av. Gral. Flores 2125, Montevideo CP 11800, Uruguay.
Oncol Rep. 2005 Aug;14(2):537-45.
Persistent high mortality rates in breast cancer patients, in spite of latest advances in diagnosis and therapy, affirm the necessity of new developments in tumor biology prognostic factors. Immunocytochemical detection of disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow has been frequently associated with a decrease in disease-free survival as an independent prognostic factor, but methods based on molecular biology procedures must still be validated. Considering tumor heterogeneity, the multimarker approach has been suggested as a better strategy than individual marker assays. The aim of this work was evaluation of the prognostic value of a multimarker reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay, associating four mRNA markers for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells. We compared the prognostic significance of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), mammaglobin (MG) and the mucin MUC5B mRNA in bone marrow aspirates in the follow-up of 80 operable breast cancer patients. The best prognostic value for clinical outcome was seen for CEA mRNA, not improved for any association with other markers. Unexpectedly, some tumor mRNA in bone marrow correlates with a favorable clinical outcome, especially MUC5B. Therefore, our results suggest that not all epithelial or tumor markers have the same significance in predicting the metastatic potential of disseminated cancer cells. New parameters are needed for the identification of individual patients at high risk of tumor recurrence. Multimarker RT-PCR assays could be a good approach, but they should be performed associating mRNA markers that are able to predict tumor aggressiveness associated with poor outcome and not just epithelial markers, which only indicate the mere presence of tumor cells.
尽管在诊断和治疗方面取得了最新进展,但乳腺癌患者的死亡率持续居高不下,这表明肿瘤生物学预后因素有必要取得新的进展。免疫细胞化学检测骨髓中播散性乳腺癌细胞常与无病生存期缩短相关,是一个独立的预后因素,但基于分子生物学程序的方法仍需验证。考虑到肿瘤的异质性,多标志物方法被认为是比单个标志物检测更好的策略。这项工作的目的是评估一种多标志物逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测方法的预后价值,该方法联合使用四种mRNA标志物来检测播散性乳腺癌细胞。我们比较了80例可手术乳腺癌患者随访过程中骨髓穿刺物中细胞角蛋白19(CK19)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、乳腺珠蛋白(MG)和粘蛋白MUC5B mRNA的预后意义。CEA mRNA对临床结局的预后价值最佳,与其他标志物联合使用并未改善。出乎意料的是,骨髓中的一些肿瘤mRNA与良好的临床结局相关,尤其是MUC5B。因此,我们的结果表明,并非所有上皮或肿瘤标志物在预测播散性癌细胞的转移潜能方面都具有相同的意义。需要新的参数来识别有肿瘤复发高风险的个体患者。多标志物RT-PCR检测可能是一种很好的方法,但应联合使用能够预测与不良结局相关的肿瘤侵袭性的mRNA标志物,而不仅仅是仅表明肿瘤细胞存在的上皮标志物。