Berends N, Teunkens A, Vandermeersch E, Van de Velde M
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2005;56(2):155-62.
A prospective, randomized study was designed to compare the maternal and neonatal effects of conventional epidural anesthesia and combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSE) for Cesarean section in severe preeclamptic patients. Additionally, two strategies in the prophylactic management of hypotension in severe preeclamptic patients were evaluated: fluid preloading or prophylactic ephedrine.
Thirty nonlaboring women with severe preeclampsia (PET), scheduled for an elective Cesarean section, were randomised into three groups: epidural anesthesia with prophylactic fluid loading (EA-F), combined spinal epidural anesthesia with prophylactic fluid loading (CSE-F), or combined spinal epidural anesthesia with prophylactic ephedrine (CSE-V). Hemodynamic data were recorded prior and after induction of regional anesthesia at five-minute intervals. The total amount of intravenous administered fluid and the total dose of vasopressors were recorded.
Hemodynamic data were similar between the three groups. The incidence and duration of hypotension was similar in all three groups. Significantly more ephedrine was used in the CSE-V group as compared to the CSE-F group. More lactated Ringer's solution was used in the CSE-F group as compared to the CSE-V group. There were no hypertensive episodes and none of the patients developed pulmonary edema. The time period from induction until the start of surgery and the duration of surgery were significantly shorter in both CSE-groups. Neonatal outcome was comparable between the three groups.
Our results confirm that combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSE) is a safe alternative to conventional epidural anesthesia in severe preeclamptic women and that the prophylactic use of ephedrine is effective and safe to prevent and treat spinal hypotension after combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section in severe preeclamptic women.
一项前瞻性随机研究旨在比较传统硬膜外麻醉与腰麻 - 硬膜外联合麻醉(CSE)用于重度子痫前期患者剖宫产时对母体和新生儿的影响。此外,还评估了重度子痫前期患者低血压预防性处理的两种策略:液体预负荷或预防性使用麻黄碱。
30例计划择期剖宫产的未临产重度子痫前期(PET)妇女被随机分为三组:预防性液体预负荷的硬膜外麻醉(EA - F)组、预防性液体预负荷的腰麻 - 硬膜外联合麻醉(CSE - F)组或预防性使用麻黄碱的腰麻 - 硬膜外联合麻醉(CSE - V)组。在区域麻醉诱导前后每隔5分钟记录血流动力学数据。记录静脉输注液体总量和血管升压药总剂量。
三组间血流动力学数据相似。三组低血压的发生率和持续时间相似。与CSE - F组相比,CSE - V组使用的麻黄碱明显更多。与CSE - V组相比,CSE - F组使用的乳酸林格液更多。未出现高血压发作,且无一例患者发生肺水肿。两个CSE组从诱导到手术开始的时间和手术持续时间明显更短。三组间新生儿结局相当。
我们的结果证实,腰麻 - 硬膜外联合麻醉(CSE)是重度子痫前期妇女传统硬膜外麻醉的一种安全替代方法,并且预防性使用麻黄碱在重度子痫前期妇女剖宫产腰麻 - 硬膜外联合麻醉后预防和治疗脊髓性低血压方面有效且安全。