Tsioufis Costas, Stougiannos Pavlos, Kakkavas Apostolis, Toutouza Marina, Mariolis Argiris, Vlasseros Ioannis, Stefanadis Christodoulos, Kallikazaros Ioannis
Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jul 15;96(2):252-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.054.
In this study, we investigated possible relations between left ventricular (LV) concentric remodeling and plasma levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and serum amyloid-A (SAA) in subjects who had essential hypertension; 65 consecutive subjects who had hypertension, did not have diabetes, and had normal LV mass were categorized as those whose LV relative wall thickness was <0.44 (n = 41) and those whose relative wall thickness was > or =0.44. Venous blood samples were collected for determination of metabolic profile and plasma levels of hs-CRP and SAA. Subjects whose relative LV wall thickness was > or =0.44 compared with those whose relative LV wall thickness was <0.44 had significantly increased systolic blood pressure by 4.5 mm Hg (p = 0.015) and higher levels of plasma hs-CRP (1.80 vs 1.39 mg/L, p = 0.001) and SAA (10.22 vs 4.86 mg/dl, p = 0.000), although the 2 groups did not differ with regard to age, gender, waist-to-hip ratio, and diastolic blood pressure (p = NS for all). In the entire study population, log hs-CRP and SAA exhibited positive relations with systolic blood pressure (r = 0.21 and r = 0.29, respectively; p <0.05 for the 2 markers) and relative wall thickness (r = 0.26 and r = 0.81, respectively; p <0.05 for the 2 markers). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that age, gender, and diastolic blood pressure were significantly associated with LV mass index (p <0.05), whereas gender, body mass index, log hs-CRP, and SAA were significantly associated with relative wall thickness (p <0.003). By analysis of covariance, log hs-CRP and SAA were significantly different between subjects whose relative LV wall thickness was > or =0.44 and those whose relative LV wall thickness was <0.44 after the adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, and systolic/diastolic blood pressure (p <0.005 for the 2 markers). In conclusion, alterations in LV geometry are associated with increased serum CRP and SAA levels in patients who are newly diagnosed with essential hypertension.
在本研究中,我们调查了原发性高血压患者左心室(LV)向心性重塑与高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)血浆水平及血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)之间的可能关系;65例连续入选的高血压患者,无糖尿病且左心室质量正常,根据左心室相对壁厚度分为<0.44组(n = 41)和≥0.44组。采集静脉血样本以测定代谢指标以及hs-CRP和SAA的血浆水平。与左心室相对壁厚度<0.44的受试者相比,左心室相对壁厚度≥0.44的受试者收缩压显著升高4.5 mmHg(p = 0.(此处英文原文有误,推测应为0.015)),血浆hs-CRP水平更高(1.80 vs 1.39 mg/L,p = 0.001),SAA水平也更高(10.22 vs 4.86 mg/dl,p = 0.000),尽管两组在年龄、性别、腰臀比和舒张压方面无差异(所有p值均无统计学意义)。在整个研究人群中,log hs-CRP和SAA与收缩压呈正相关(r分别为0.21和0.29;两个指标p均<0.05),与相对壁厚度也呈正相关(r分别为0.26和0.81;两个指标p均<0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示,年龄、性别和舒张压与左心室质量指数显著相关(p <0.05),而性别、体重指数、log hs-CRP和SAA与相对壁厚度显著相关(p <0.003)。通过协方差分析,在对年龄、性别、体重指数和收缩压/舒张压进行校正后,左心室相对壁厚度≥0.44的受试者与左心室相对壁厚度<0.44的受试者之间,log hs-CRP和SAA存在显著差异(两个指标p均<0.005)。总之,新诊断的原发性高血压患者左心室几何形态的改变与血清CRP和SAA水平升高有关。