Ruminjo Joseph K, Sekadde-Kigondu Christine B, Karanja Joseph G, Rivera Roberto, Nasution Marlina, Nutley Tara
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Contraception. 2005 Aug;72(2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.04.001.
We compared 12-month continuation rates, menstrual bleeding patterns and other aspects of acceptability between users of Cyclofem and users of Depo-Provera.
The life-table method was used to calculate quarterly continuation rates. In all, 360 Kenyan women were randomly assigned to one of the two contraceptives. User-satisfaction questionnaires were administered at 6 and 12 months or at discontinuation, whichever occurred first.
The 1-year continuation rate was 75.4% for Depo-Provera users versus 56.5% for Cyclofem users (p<.001). Main reasons for discontinuation included difficulty making clinic visits (45.1% for Cyclofem vs. 40% for Depo-Provera), menstrual changes (14.1% vs. 12.5%) and nonmenstrual problems (15.5% vs. 12.5%). None of the Depo-Provera users and 8.5% of the Cyclofem users claimed frequency of visits as the main reason for discontinuation. In all, 70.6% of the Depo-Provera users were amenorrheic after 12 months, as were 20.8% of the Cyclofem users.
The 1-year continuation rate was higher for Depo-Provera than for Cyclofem. There was no important difference in discontinuation rates because of menstrual problems; the difference mainly reflected the frequency of visits required.
我们比较了使用Cyclofem和使用醋酸甲羟孕酮(Depo-Provera)的使用者的12个月续用率、月经出血模式及其他可接受性方面。
采用寿命表法计算季度续用率。总共360名肯尼亚女性被随机分配至两种避孕药之一。在6个月和12个月时或停药时(以先发生者为准)进行使用者满意度问卷调查。
醋酸甲羟孕酮使用者的1年续用率为75.4%,而使用Cyclofem的使用者为56.5%(p<0.001)。停药的主要原因包括就诊困难(Cyclofem使用者为45.1%,醋酸甲羟孕酮使用者为40%)、月经变化(14.1%对12.5%)和非月经问题(15.5%对12.5%)。没有醋酸甲羟孕酮使用者将就诊频率作为停药的主要原因,而Cyclofem使用者中有8.5%这样认为。总体而言,12个月后70.6%的醋酸甲羟孕酮使用者闭经,Cyclofem使用者中闭经者为20.8%。
醋酸甲羟孕酮的1年续用率高于Cyclofem。因月经问题导致的停药率没有重要差异;差异主要反映了所需就诊的频率。