Riddell Denise, Pacey Allan, Whittington Kate
University of Bristol, Clinical Science at South Bristol (Obstetrics & Gynaecology), St Michael's Hospital, Southwell Street, Bristol, UK.
Hum Reprod. 2005 Dec;20(12):3441-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei230. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
Sperm morphology is known to correlate with the probability of conception both in vitro and in vivo, but the assessment of sperm morphology in the laboratory remains problematic. The 4th edition (1999) of the World Health Organization (WHO) Laboratory Manual has attempted to improve matters by giving rigorous recommendations regarding sperm morphology assessment. However, it is unknown how well these recommendations have been implemented in practice.
A survey of the methods used to undertake the assessment of sperm morphology during semen analysis was undertaken in 37 laboratories in the UK.
In total, only two laboratories (5%) were compliant with all current WHO guidelines regarding morphology assessment, including methods of staining and observation, classifying and sampling methods, and the participation in internal and external quality control programmes.
These results illustrate an urgent need for education and training initiatives to encourage laboratories to become compliant with current WHO guidelines for sperm morphology assessment.
已知精子形态与体内外受孕概率相关,但实验室中精子形态的评估仍存在问题。世界卫生组织(WHO)《实验室手册》第4版(1999年)试图通过对精子形态评估给出严格建议来改善这种情况。然而,尚不清楚这些建议在实际中执行得如何。
对英国37家实验室用于精液分析中精子形态评估的方法进行了一项调查。
总体而言,只有两家实验室(5%)符合WHO目前关于形态评估的所有指南,包括染色和观察方法、分类和抽样方法,以及参与内部和外部质量控制计划。
这些结果表明迫切需要开展教育和培训活动,以鼓励实验室遵守WHO目前关于精子形态评估的指南。