Suppr超能文献

医生是否正确治疗有症状的骨关节炎患者?AMICA研究结果。

Do physicians treat symptomatic osteoarthritis patients properly? Results of the AMICA experience.

作者信息

Sarzi-Puttini Piercarlo, Cimmino Marco A, Scarpa Raffaele, Caporali Roberto, Parazzini Fabio, Zaninelli Augusto, Atzeni Fabiola, Marcolongo Roberto

机构信息

Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Aug;35(1 Suppl 1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2005.02.005.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of the AMICA project was to photograph the Italian scenario of osteoarthritis (OA) and its treatment in general and specialty practice. The study was designed to evaluate their prescription modalities to determine whether they matched the recently proposed treatment guidelines for OA (ACR 2000; EULAR 2000; APS 2002).

METHODS

The study involved 2764 general practitioners (GPs) and 316 specialists who enrolled a total of 25,589 patients with OA of the hand, knee, and hip.

RESULTS

Pharmacological treatment alone was prescribed to 55% of the patients seen by GPs, 25% of those seen by rheumatologists, 8% of those seen by orthopedic surgeons, and 17% of those seen by physical medicine specialists (GPs versus specialists, P < 0.001). Specialists often prescribed a combined pharmacological and nonpharmacological approach (rheumatologists 51%, orthopedic surgeons 66%, physical medicine specialists 76%). Concomitant comorbidities and their treatment do not seem to influence OA prescription modalities except for peptic ulcer and anticoagulant therapy. The presence of peptic ulcer was associated with a reduction in NSAID prescriptions (OR 0.61, CI 0.53 to 0.69) and more frequent use of Coxibs (OR 1.15, CI 1.03 to 1.28) and simple analgesics (OR 1.42; CI 1.26 to 1.61), as well as physical therapy. NSAIDs and Coxibs also were less frequently prescribed if patients were receiving anticoagulant therapy (NSAIDs OR 0.86, CI 0.70 to 1.06; Coxibs: OR 0.77; CI 0.64 to 0.93). Gastroprotective therapy was more frequently used in patients treated with NSAIDs, Coxibs, and analgesics. There was no significant difference in therapies prescribed for patients with hypertension or cardiac disease (myocardial infarction and/or angina pectoris).

CONCLUSIONS

The published guidelines appear to be properly used by most of the physicians in terms of the pharmacological approach; however, the increased use of Coxibs has not reduced the amount of prescribed gastroprotection. No specific precautions were observed in the treatment of patients with hypertension or cardiac problems. Nonpharmacological treatments are mainly used in conjunction with medications and did not take into account the findings of evidence-based medicine. Continuing education of GPs and specialists caring for OA patients is essential.

摘要

目的

AMICA项目的主要目的是拍摄意大利骨关节炎(OA)的病情及其在普通和专科医疗中的治疗情况。该研究旨在评估其处方方式,以确定是否符合最近提出的OA治疗指南(美国风湿病学会2000年;欧洲抗风湿病联盟2000年;意大利风湿病学会2002年)。

方法

该研究涉及2764名全科医生(GP)和316名专科医生,他们共纳入了25589例手部、膝部和髋部OA患者。

结果

仅接受药物治疗的患者比例分别为:全科医生诊治患者中的55%、风湿病专科医生诊治患者中的25%、骨科医生诊治患者中的8%、物理医学专科医生诊治患者中的17%(全科医生与专科医生相比,P<0.001)。专科医生通常采用药物和非药物联合治疗方法(风湿病专科医生为51%,骨科医生为66%,物理医学专科医生为76%)。除消化性溃疡和抗凝治疗外,合并症及其治疗似乎不影响OA的处方方式。消化性溃疡的存在与非甾体抗炎药处方减少相关(比值比0.61,95%置信区间0.53至0.69),更频繁使用环氧化酶-2抑制剂(比值比1.15,95%置信区间1.03至1.28)和单纯镇痛药(比值比1.42;95%置信区间1.26至1.61),以及物理治疗。如果患者正在接受抗凝治疗,非甾体抗炎药和环氧化酶-2抑制剂的处方也较少(非甾体抗炎药比值比0.86,95%置信区间0.70至1.06;环氧化酶-2抑制剂:比值比0.77;95%置信区间0.64至0.93)。在接受非甾体抗炎药、环氧化酶-2抑制剂和镇痛药治疗的患者中,更频繁地使用了胃保护治疗。对于高血压或心脏病(心肌梗死和/或心绞痛)患者,所开的治疗方法没有显著差异。

结论

就药物治疗方法而言,大多数医生似乎正确使用了已发表的指南;然而,环氧化酶-2抑制剂使用的增加并未减少胃保护药物的处方量。在高血压或心脏问题患者的治疗中未观察到特定的预防措施。非药物治疗主要与药物联合使用,且未考虑循证医学的结果。对照顾OA患者的全科医生和专科医生进行继续教育至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验