Gaudin Sylvestre, Yazbeck Abdo S
Department of Economics, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(3):694-706. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.042. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
Previously published evidence from the 1992-1993 Indian National Family and Health Survey (NFHS) on the state of childhood immunization showed the importance of analyzing immunization outcomes beyond national averages. Reported total system failure (no immunization for all) in some low performance areas suggested that improvements in immunization levels may come with a worsening of the distribution of immunization based on wealth. In this paper, using the second wave of the NFHS (1998-1999), we take a new snapshot of the situation and compare it to 1992-1993, focusing on heterogeneities between states, rural-urban differentials, gender differentials, and more specifically on wealth-related inequalities. To assess whether improvements in overall immunization rates (levels) were accompanied by distributional improvements, or conversely, whether inequalities were reduced at the expense of overall achievement, we use a recently developed methodology to calculate an inequality-adjusted achievement index that captures performance both in terms of efficiency (change in levels) and equity (distribution by wealth quintiles) for each of the 17 largest Indian states. Comparing 1992-1993 to 1998-1999 achievements using different degrees of "inequality aversion" provides no evidence that distributional improvements occur at the expense of overall performance.
先前发表的1992 - 1993年印度全国家庭与健康调查(NFHS)中有关儿童免疫状况的证据表明,分析超出全国平均水平的免疫结果具有重要意义。一些低绩效地区报告的全系统失败情况(所有儿童均未接种疫苗)表明,免疫水平的提高可能伴随着基于财富的免疫接种分布情况的恶化。在本文中,我们利用NFHS的第二轮调查(1998 - 1999年)对情况进行了新的快照式分析,并将其与1992 - 1993年的情况进行比较,重点关注各邦之间的异质性、城乡差异、性别差异,更具体地说是与财富相关的不平等。为了评估总体免疫接种率(水平)的提高是否伴随着分布情况的改善,或者相反,不平等是否以牺牲总体成就为代价而减少,我们使用一种最近开发的方法来计算一个不平等调整后的成就指数,该指数捕捉了印度17个最大邦中每个邦在效率(水平变化)和公平(按财富五分位数分布)方面的表现。使用不同程度的“不平等厌恶”比较1992 - 1993年和1998 - 1999年的成就,没有证据表明分布情况的改善是以牺牲总体绩效为代价的。