Suppr超能文献

双腔植入式心律转复除颤器中一种基于心房的新型心室管理起搏模式(MVP)的多中心、前瞻性、随机安全性和有效性研究。

Multicenter, prospective, randomized safety and efficacy study of a new atrial-based managed ventricular pacing mode (MVP) in dual chamber ICDs.

作者信息

Sweeney Michael O, Ellenbogen Kenneth A, Casavant David, Betzold Robert, Sheldon Todd, Tang Feng, Mueller Megan, Lingle John

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Aug;16(8):811-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40766.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventricular desynchronization caused by right ventricular pacing may impair ventricular function and increase risk of heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (AF), and death. Conventional DDD/R mode often results in high cumulative percentage ventricular pacing (Cum%VP). We hypothesized that a new managed ventricular pacing mode (MVP) would safely provide AAI/R pacing with ventricular monitoring and DDD/R during AV block (AVB) and reduce Cum%VP compared to DDD/R.

METHODS

MVP RAMware was downloaded in 181 patients with Marquis DR ICDs. Patients were initially randomized to either MVP or DDD/R for 1 month, then crossed over to the opposite mode for 1 month. ICD diagnostics were analyzed for cumulative percentage atrial pacing (Cum%AP), Cum%VP, and duration of DDD/R pacing for spontaneous AVB.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics included age 66 +/- 12 years, EF 36 +/- 14%, and NYHA Class II-III 36%. Baseline PR interval was 190 +/- 53 msec and programmed AV intervals (DDD/R) were 216 +/- 50 (paced)/189 +/- 53 (sensed) msec. Mean Cum%VP was significantly lower in MVP versus DDD/R (4.1 +/- 16.3 vs 73.8 +/- 32.5, P < 0.0001). The median absolute and relative reductions in Cum%VP during MVP were 85.0 and 99.9, respectively. Mean Cum%AP was not different between MVP versus DDD/R (48.7 +/- 38.5 vs 47.3 +/- 38.4, P = 0.83). During MVP overall time spent in AAI/R was 89.6% (intrinsic conduction), DDD/R 6.7% (intermittent AVB), and DDI/R 3.7% (AF). No adverse events were attributed to MVP.

CONCLUSIONS

MVP safely achieves functional atrial pacing by limiting ventricular pacing to periods of intermittent AVB and AF in ICD patients, significantly reducing Cum%VP compared to DDD/R. MVP is a universal pacing mode that adapts to AVB and AF, providing both atrial pacing and ventricular pacing support when needed.

摘要

背景

右心室起搏引起的心室失同步可能损害心室功能,并增加心力衰竭(CHF)、心房颤动(AF)和死亡风险。传统的DDD/R模式通常导致较高的心室起搏累积百分比(Cum%VP)。我们假设一种新的管理心室起搏模式(MVP)能够在房室传导阻滞(AVB)期间安全地提供带有心室监测功能的AAI/R起搏以及DDD/R起搏,并且与DDD/R相比能降低Cum%VP。

方法

在181例植入Marquis DR型植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)的患者中下载MVP软件。患者最初随机分为MVP组或DDD/R组,各为期1个月,然后交叉至相反模式再进行1个月。对ICD诊断数据进行分析,以获取心房起搏累积百分比(Cum%AP)、Cum%VP以及自发性AVB时的DDD/R起搏持续时间。

结果

基线特征包括年龄66±12岁,射血分数(EF)36±14%,纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级II - III级占36%。基线PR间期为190±53毫秒,程控房室间期(DDD/R)为216±50(起搏)/189±53(感知)毫秒。与DDD/R相比,MVP组的平均Cum%VP显著更低(4.1±16.3对73.8±32.5,P<0.0001)。MVP期间Cum%VP的中位数绝对降幅和相对降幅分别为85.0和99.9。MVP组与DDD/R组的平均Cum%AP无差异(48.7±38.5对47.3±38.4,P = 0.83)。在MVP期间,总体处于AAI/R的时间占89.6%(自身传导),DDD/R占6.7%(间歇性AVB),DDI/R占3.7%(AF)。未发现与MVP相关的不良事件。

结论

MVP通过将心室起搏限制在间歇性AVB和AF期间,安全地实现了功能性心房起搏,与DDD/R相比显著降低了Cum%VP。MVP是一种通用的起搏模式,可适应AVB和AF,在需要时既能提供心房起搏又能提供心室起搏支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验