Tovey Philip, Broom Alex, Chatwin John, Hafeez Muhammad, Ahmad Salma
School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, UK.
Integr Cancer Ther. 2005 Sep;4(3):242-8. doi: 10.1177/1534735405279600.
Virtually no research has been conducted on patient assessments of traditional medicines and allopathic medicines for cancer care in poorer countries marked by pluralistic medical environments. Pakistan represents an excellent case for such a study because of the coexistence of culturally and historically specific indigenous traditional medicine, the strong presence of allopathic medicine, and, to a lesser extent, the availability of some globalized complementary and alternative medicines.
To gain a preliminary understanding of cancer patients' perceptions of effectiveness and satisfaction with traditional medicine, globalized complementary and alternative medicine, and allopathy in the context of a pluralistic medical environment.
Structured survey of 362 cancer patients, from diverse regions in the Punjab province and Northwest Frontier province, who were being treated in 4 different hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan.
Use of traditional medicine remains high among cancer patients, with traditional healers used by the majority of those surveyed. Although patients' perceptions of the overall effectiveness of traditional medicines for treating cancer are low, those patients who do use traditional medicines still have high levels of satisfaction with these modalities. This is distinct from levels of satisfaction with, and perceptions of effectiveness of, Western cancer treatments, which were synonymous in this group of patients. Important differences in patient perceptions were found within groups (eg, between different forms of traditional healers) as well as between them.
This study showed considerable support for complementary and alternative medicine/traditional medicine but also significant variation in usage of and perceptions of local traditional medicines. More research needs to be done to explore the social processes underlying this variation in cancer patients' preferences for particular traditional medicines.
在以多元医疗环境为特征的较贫穷国家,几乎没有关于患者对用于癌症治疗的传统药物和对抗疗法药物评估的研究。巴基斯坦是此类研究的一个绝佳案例,因为这里存在具有文化和历史特色的本土传统医学,对抗疗法占据主导地位,并且在较小程度上还存在一些全球化的补充和替代药物。
初步了解在多元医疗环境下癌症患者对传统药物、全球化补充和替代药物以及对抗疗法的有效性认知和满意度。
对来自旁遮普省和西北边境省不同地区、正在巴基斯坦拉合尔4家不同医院接受治疗的362名癌症患者进行结构化调查。
癌症患者对传统药物的使用率仍然很高,大多数接受调查者会求助于传统治疗师。尽管患者对传统药物治疗癌症的总体有效性评价较低,但那些使用传统药物的患者对这些治疗方式仍有较高的满意度。这与对西方癌症治疗的满意度和有效性认知不同,在这组患者中,二者是同义词。在不同群体内部(如不同形式的传统治疗师之间)以及不同群体之间,患者的认知存在重要差异。
本研究显示了对补充和替代医学/传统医学的大力支持,但当地传统药物的使用和认知也存在显著差异。需要开展更多研究来探索癌症患者对特定传统药物偏好差异背后的社会过程。