Dimitroulopoulos Dimitrios, Tsamakidis Klisthenis, Xinopoulos Dimitrios, Karaitianos Ioannis, Fotopoulou Aikaterini, Paraskevas Emmanouil
Gastroenterology Unit, Saint Savvas Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Clin Ther. 2005 Jun;27(6):746-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.016.
Infrared photocoagulation (IRP) is commonly used in the treatment of hemorrhoids, but rectal bleeding can persist after this procedure. Adjuvant therapy may thus be considered for more definitive control of symptoms, particularly bleeding.
The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of a treatment combining IRP and oral micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) versus each treatment used alone on bleeding cessation in patients with grades I, II, and III acute internal hemorrhoids.
This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study. Consecutive outpatients were randomly assigned to a treatment combining MPFF and IRP or to each treatment separately. For each patient, bleeding status was reported at day 0 (day of inclusion) and compared with that at day 5 after treatment by observers blinded to treatment assignment. Follow-up visits were planned at days 7, 30, 60, and 90 of therapy, including monitoring of treatment-related side effects and self-reporting by patients of any problem related to hemorrhoidal disease.
A total of 351 patients (180 women, 171 men) were enrolled in the study. Their mean age was 49.2 years (range, 29-71 years). Hemorrhoids were grade I in 33.6% (118 patients), grade II in 48.7% (171 patients), and grade III in 17.7% (62 patients) of the study population. Patients were randomly assigned to each of the 3 treatment groups (117 patients in each), with no significant difference between groups in the age, sex, or distribution of grade of hemorrhoids. The percentage of patients with no bleeding after 5 days of treatment was higher in the combined treatment group (74.8%) compared with MPFF alone (59.6%; P = 0.023) or with IRP alone (55.6%; P = 0.004). MPFF alone was as effective as IRP alone at stopping bleeding. Patients with grades I and II hemorrhoids responded significantly better (82.5% and 61.7%, respectively) to either treatment than those with grade III hemorrhoids (22.9%; P < 0.001). Of the 216 patients who were followed up for 90 days, 3 had a gastrointestinal adverse event, and 19 had a relapse of bleeding.
Five days of treatment combining MPFF with IRP significantly reduced bleeding status in these study patients with grades I and II acute internal hemorrhoids compared with each treatment used alone.
红外光凝术(IRP)常用于治疗痔疮,但术后直肠出血可能持续存在。因此,可考虑采用辅助治疗以更有效地控制症状,尤其是出血症状。
本研究旨在比较IRP联合口服微粉化纯化黄酮类成分(MPFF)与单独使用每种治疗方法对Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ度急性内痔患者止血的疗效。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲研究。连续门诊患者被随机分配至MPFF与IRP联合治疗组或单独使用每种治疗方法的组中。对于每位患者,在第0天(纳入日)报告出血状况,并由对治疗分配不知情的观察者将其与治疗后第5天的出血状况进行比较。计划在治疗的第7、30、60和90天进行随访,包括监测与治疗相关的副作用以及患者自行报告任何与痔疮疾病相关的问题。
共有351例患者(180例女性,171例男性)纳入本研究。他们的平均年龄为49.2岁(范围29 - 71岁)。在研究人群中,Ⅰ度痔疮患者占33.6%(118例),Ⅱ度痔疮患者占48.7%(171例),Ⅲ度痔疮患者占17.7%(62例)。患者被随机分配至3个治疗组中的每组(每组117例),各组在年龄、性别或痔疮分级分布方面无显著差异。联合治疗组治疗5天后无出血的患者百分比(74.8%)高于单独使用MPFF组(59.6%;P = 0.023)或单独使用IRP组(55.6%;P = 0.004)。单独使用MPFF与单独使用IRP在止血方面效果相当。Ⅰ度和Ⅱ度痔疮患者对任何一种治疗的反应均显著优于Ⅲ度痔疮患者(分别为82.5%和61.7%,对比22.9%;P < 0.001)。在216例接受90天随访的患者中,3例出现胃肠道不良事件,19例出血复发。
与单独使用每种治疗方法相比,MPFF与IRP联合治疗5天可显著降低本研究中Ⅰ度和Ⅱ度急性内痔患者的出血状况。