Boulanger Bryan, Vargo John D, Schnoor Jerald L, Hornbuckle Keri C
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, SC 4105, Iowa City, Iowa 52240, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Aug 1;39(15):5524-30. doi: 10.1021/es050213u.
The origin and amount of perfluorooctane surfactants in wastewater treatment systems, and the transformation these compounds may undergo during treatment, were evaluated through measurement and experiment. Influent, effluent, and river water at the point of discharge for a 6-MGD wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) were screened for eight perfluorooctane surfactants. N-EtFOSAA was quantified in influent (5.1 +/- 0.8 ng/L), effluent (3.6 +/- 0.2 ng/ L), and river water samples (1.2 +/- 0.3 ng/L), while PFOS and PFOA were quantified in effluent (26 +/- 2.0 and 22 +/- 2.1 ng/L, respectively) and river water (23 +/- 1.5 and 8.7 +/- 0.8 ng/L, respectively). Signals for PFOS and PFOA were observed in influent samples, but exact quantitative determination could not be made due to low recoveries of these two compounds in field spike samples. Although the source of PFOS and PFOA observed in WWTP effluents is not clear, two hypotheses were examined: (1) the highly substituted perfluorooctane surfactants that constitute commercially available fabric protectors can be transformed to PFOS and PFOA during biological treatment in wastewater treatment systems, and (2) the end products themselves are directly introduced to WWTPs because they are present as residual in the commercial mixtures. Biotransformation experiments of 96 h were run to determine whether N-EtFOSE (a primary monomer used in 3M's polymer surface protection products) could be transformed to lesser-substituted perfluorooctane compounds in bioreactors amended with aerobic and anaerobic sludge from the sampled plant. At the end of the aerobic biotransformation experiment, N-EtFOSAA and PFOSulfinate were the only two metabolites formed and each accounted for 23 +/- 5.0% and 5.3 +/- 0.8% of the transformed parent on a molar basis, respectively. Transformation of N-EtFOSE was not observed under anaerobic conditions. A sample of a commercially available surface protection product from 1994 was analyzed and found to contain six of the targeted perfluorinated surfactants, including PFOS and PFOA. These findings suggest transformation of precursors within wastewater treatment is not an important source of these compounds compared to direct use and disposal of products containing the end products as residual amounts.
通过测量和实验,对污水处理系统中全氟辛烷表面活性剂的来源和含量,以及这些化合物在处理过程中可能发生的转化进行了评估。对一座600万加仑/天污水处理厂(WWTP)的进水、出水和排放点的河水进行了8种全氟辛烷表面活性剂的筛查。在进水(5.1±0.8纳克/升)、出水(3.6±0.2纳克/升)和河水样本(1.2±0.3纳克/升)中对N-乙基全氟辛烷磺酸进行了定量分析,而在出水(分别为26±2.0和22±2.1纳克/升)和河水中(分别为23±1.5和8.7±0.8纳克/升)对全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛酸进行了定量分析。在进水样本中观察到了全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛酸的信号,但由于这两种化合物在现场加标样本中的回收率较低,无法进行准确的定量测定。虽然在污水处理厂出水中观察到的全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛酸的来源尚不清楚,但研究了两种假设:(1)构成市售织物保护剂的高度取代的全氟辛烷表面活性剂在污水处理系统的生物处理过程中可转化为全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛酸,以及(2)最终产物本身因作为残留物存在于商业混合物中而被直接引入污水处理厂。进行了96小时的生物转化实验,以确定N-乙基全氟辛烷磺酸乙酯(3M公司聚合物表面保护产品中使用的一种主要单体)是否能在添加了来自采样工厂的好氧和厌氧污泥的生物反应器中转化为取代度较低的全氟辛烷化合物。在好氧生物转化实验结束时,N-乙基全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛烷亚磺酸盐是仅有的两种形成的代谢物,在摩尔基础上分别占转化母体的23±5.0%和5.3±0.8%。在厌氧条件下未观察到N-乙基全氟辛烷磺酸乙酯的转化。对1994年市售的一种表面保护产品样本进行了分析,发现其中含有6种目标全氟表面活性剂,包括全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛酸。这些发现表明,与含有最终产物残留物的产品的直接使用和处置相比,污水处理过程中前体的转化不是这些化合物的重要来源。