Purkayastha S, Tekkis P P, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Negus R, Gedroyc W, Darzi A W
Department of Surgical Oncology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Clin Radiol. 2005 Sep;60(9):980-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.04.015.
Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) is emerging as a potential complementary investigation for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and also for benign pathology such as diverticular disease. A meta-analysis reporting the use of MRC is yet to be performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRC compared with the gold-standard investigation, conventional colonoscopy (CC).
A literature search was carried out to identify studies containing comparative data between MRC findings and CC findings. Quantitative meta-analysis for diagnostic tests was performed, which included the calculation of independent sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios, the construction of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, pooled analysis and sensitivity analysis. The study heterogeneity was evaluated by the Q-test using a random-effect model to accommodate the cluster of outcomes between individual studies.
In all, 8 comparative studies were identified, involving 563 patients. The calculated pooled sensitivity for all lesions was 75% (95% CI: 47% to 91%), the specificity was 96% (95% CI: 86% to 98%) and the area under the ROC curve was 90% (weighted). On sensitivity analysis, MRC had a better diagnostic accuracy for CRC than for polyps, with a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI: 97% to 91%), a specificity of 98% (95% CI: 66% to 99%) and an area under the ROC curve of 92%. There was no significant heterogeneity between the studies with regard to the diagnostic accuracy of MRC for CRC.
This meta-analysis suggests that MRC is an imaging technique with high discrimination for cases presenting with colorectal cancer. The exact diagnostic role of MRC needs to be clarified (e.g. suitable for an elderly person with suspected CRC). Further evaluation is necessary to refine its applicability and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with other imaging methods such as computed tomography colonography.
磁共振结肠成像(MRC)正逐渐成为一种用于诊断结直肠癌(CRC)以及诸如憩室病等良性病变的潜在补充检查方法。目前尚未进行一项报告MRC应用情况的荟萃分析。本研究的目的是评估MRC与金标准检查——传统结肠镜检查(CC)相比的诊断准确性。
进行文献检索以识别包含MRC检查结果与CC检查结果对比数据的研究。对诊断试验进行定量荟萃分析,包括计算独立敏感性、特异性、诊断比值比,构建汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线、合并分析和敏感性分析。使用随机效应模型通过Q检验评估研究异质性,以适应各个研究之间结果的聚类情况。
总共识别出8项对比研究,涉及563例患者。所有病变的计算合并敏感性为75%(95%置信区间:47%至91%),特异性为96%(95%置信区间:86%至98%),ROC曲线下面积为90%(加权)。在敏感性分析中,MRC对CRC的诊断准确性优于息肉,其敏感性为91%(95%置信区间:97%至91%),特异性为98%(95%置信区间:66%至99%),ROC曲线下面积为92%。关于MRC对CRC的诊断准确性,各研究之间无显著异质性。
这项荟萃分析表明,MRC是一种对结直肠癌病例具有高鉴别能力的成像技术。MRC的确切诊断作用需要进一步明确(例如适用于疑似CRC的老年人)。与计算机断层扫描结肠成像等其他成像方法相比,有必要进行进一步评估以完善其适用性和诊断准确性。