Christiansen Ole B, Nielsen Henriette S
Fertility Clinic 4071, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Chem Immunol Allergy. 2005;88:117-127. doi: 10.1159/000087829.
Immunological disturbances play a role in the majority of patients with recurrent miscarriage (RM) and therefore treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg) has been tested in patients with RM in several trials. Seven placebo-controlled trials that were extremely heterogeneous with respect to patient characteristics and treatment procedures were carried out. One trial found that IvIg significantly improved pregnancy outcome in all patients whereas the remaining trials could either detect no treatment effect at all or only an effect in subsets of patients. In a meta-analysis, the pooled odds ratio for a new live birth in IvIg- versus placebo-treated patients with RM after a birth (secondary RM) was 1.60 (95% CI = 0.70-3.66). IvIg seems to be efficacious in patients with repeated second trimester intrauterine fetal deaths since it significantly (p < 0.01) increased the live birth rate in this subset compared with placebo. In most trials the design was suboptimal with regard to detecting any treatment effect of IvIg in RM due to low doses or starting the treatment late. A new large placebo-controlled trial should be conducted in RM patients with secondary RM or repeated second trimester fetal deaths and sufficient IvIg doses should be given with optimal timing.
免疫紊乱在大多数复发性流产(RM)患者中起作用,因此在多项试验中对RM患者进行了静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IvIg)治疗的测试。开展了7项安慰剂对照试验,这些试验在患者特征和治疗程序方面存在极大差异。一项试验发现,IvIg显著改善了所有患者的妊娠结局,而其余试验要么根本未检测到治疗效果,要么仅在部分患者亚组中检测到效果。在一项荟萃分析中,RM患者(继发性RM)在分娩后接受IvIg治疗与接受安慰剂治疗相比,新活产的合并比值比为1.60(95%CI = 0.70 - 3.66)。IvIg似乎对反复发生孕中期宫内胎儿死亡的患者有效,因为与安慰剂相比,它显著(p < 0.01)提高了该亚组的活产率。在大多数试验中,由于剂量低或治疗开始晚,在检测IvIg对RM的任何治疗效果方面,设计并不理想。应该对继发性RM或反复发生孕中期胎儿死亡的RM患者进行一项新的大型安慰剂对照试验,并应在最佳时机给予足够剂量的IvIg。