Lewek Michael D, Ramsey Dan K, Snyder-Mackler Lynn, Rudolph Katherine S
University of Delaware, Newark 19716, USA.
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Sep;52(9):2845-53. doi: 10.1002/art.21237.
Individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) experience knee laxity and instability. Strategies aimed at muscle stabilization may influence the long-term integrity of the joint. This study sought to determine how individuals with medial knee OA respond to a rapid valgus knee movement, to investigate the relationship between muscle-stabilization strategies and knee instability.
Twenty-one subjects with medial knee OA and genu varum and 19 control subjects were tested. Subjects stood with the test limb on a movable platform, comprising a plate that translated laterally to rapidly stress the knee's medial periarticular structures and create a potentially destabilizing sensation at the knee joint. Knee motion and muscle responses were recorded. Subjects rated the condition of their knee with a self-report questionnaire about knee instability during daily activities.
Prior to plate movement, the OA subjects demonstrated more medial muscle co-contraction than did controls (P = 0.014). Following plate movement, the OA subjects shifted less weight off the test limb (P = 0.013) and had greater medial co-contraction (P = 0.037). OA subjects without knee instability had higher co-contraction of the vastus medialis medial hamstrings than did those who reported having instability that affected their daily activities (P = 0.038). More knee stability correlated positively with higher co-contraction of the vastus medialis medial hamstrings prior to plate movement (r = 0.459, P = 0.042).
Individuals with medial knee OA attempt to stabilize the knee with greater co-contraction of the medial muscle in response to laxity that appears on the medial side of the joint only. This strategy presumably contributes to higher joint compression and could exacerbate joint destruction, and therefore needs to be altered to slow or stop the progression of the OA disease process.
膝内侧骨关节炎(OA)患者会经历膝关节松弛和不稳定。旨在实现肌肉稳定的策略可能会影响关节的长期完整性。本研究旨在确定膝内侧OA患者对快速外翻膝关节运动的反应,以研究肌肉稳定策略与膝关节不稳定之间的关系。
对21名膝内侧OA伴膝内翻的受试者和19名对照受试者进行测试。受试者将测试肢体站立在一个可移动平台上,该平台包括一块可横向平移的板,以快速压迫膝关节内侧的关节周围结构,并在膝关节处产生潜在的不稳定感。记录膝关节运动和肌肉反应。受试者通过一份关于日常活动中膝关节不稳定的自我报告问卷对其膝关节状况进行评分。
在板移动之前,OA受试者比对照组表现出更多的内侧肌肉共同收缩(P = 0.014)。板移动后,OA受试者从测试肢体上转移的体重较少(P = 0.013),并且有更大的内侧共同收缩(P = 0.037)。没有膝关节不稳定的OA受试者比那些报告有影响其日常活动的不稳定的受试者,股内侧肌和内侧腘绳肌有更高的共同收缩(P = 0.038)。在板移动之前,更多的膝关节稳定性与股内侧肌和内侧腘绳肌更高的共同收缩呈正相关(r = 0.459,P = 0.042)。
膝内侧OA患者试图通过更大程度地共同收缩内侧肌肉来稳定膝关节,以应对仅在关节内侧出现的松弛。这种策略可能会导致更高的关节压缩,并可能加剧关节破坏,因此需要改变以减缓或阻止OA疾病进程的进展。