Zheng B, Verjee F, Lomax A, MacKenzie C L
Human Motor Systems Laboratory, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Surg Endosc. 2005 Oct;19(10):1388-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8209-2. Epub 2005 Aug 25.
In the performance of complex laparoscopic tasks, one question is whether the task should be distributed between two operators or accomplished bimanually by one operator. The authors hypothesized that superior task performance results when two operators work collaboratively in a dyad team as opposed to one operator performing the task bimanually. Furthermore, in a visually misaligned condition, the performance of a team will be more robust than that of a single operator working alone.
The suture-cutting task was performed by 24 right-handed subjects in a mock surgical setup using a laparoscopic grasper and a pair of laparoscopic scissors. The cutting task was performed by 8 subjects bimanually (using both limbs) and 16 paired subjects unimanually (using their preferred limbs). The image of the work plane was displayed either vertically or superimposed over the work plane. In half of the conditions, the camera was rotated 45 degrees, causing misalignment between the actual and displayed work planes. Movements were videotaped. Important movement events were identified and used to subdivide the task into subtasks. Durations of the subtasks and attempts for grasping and cutting were analyzed using a mixed-design multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).
For a number of subtasks, the dyad group showed shorter durations than the bimanual group. The 45 degrees rotation of the camera degraded both bimanual and dyad performance, resulting in prolonged movement times for all subtasks. The learning process was facilitated by the superimposed display in that grasper and scissor reaching times improved over trials, as compared with the vertical display.
The results indicate the superior role of team collaboration, as compared with the single operator, in a complex remote manipulation such as a laparoscopic cutting task. This enhanced task performance is achieved because of the larger capacity for information processing. These results may have some relevance for optimizing performance of endoscopic surgery.
在进行复杂的腹腔镜任务时,一个问题是该任务应由两名操作者分担还是由一名操作者双手完成。作者假设,两名操作者在二元团队中协同工作时,任务表现优于一名操作者双手执行任务。此外,在视觉上未对齐的情况下,团队的表现将比单独工作的单个操作者更稳健。
24名右利手受试者在模拟手术环境中使用腹腔镜抓钳和一对腹腔镜剪刀进行缝线切割任务。8名受试者用双手(使用双侧肢体)完成切割任务,16对受试者用单手(使用其优势肢体)完成。工作平面的图像以垂直方式显示或叠加在工作平面上。在一半的情况下,摄像头旋转45度,导致实际工作平面与显示的工作平面之间未对齐。动作被录像。识别重要的动作事件,并用于将任务细分为子任务。使用混合设计多变量方差分析(MANOVA)分析子任务的持续时间以及抓握和切割的尝试次数。
对于一些子任务,二元组的持续时间比双手组短。摄像头旋转45度会降低双手组和二元组的表现,导致所有子任务的动作时间延长。叠加显示有助于学习过程,因为与垂直显示相比,抓钳和剪刀的到达时间在试验过程中有所改善。
结果表明,在诸如腹腔镜切割任务这样的复杂远程操作中,与单个操作者相比,团队协作具有更优越的作用。由于更大的信息处理能力,实现了任务表现的提升。这些结果可能与优化内镜手术的表现有一定关联。