Rey-Becerra A, Díaz-Marcaccio R, Castro-Fernández M, Scavone-Mauro C, Ruggia-Aritzti R
Hospital Pereira Rossell, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Rev Neurol. 2005;41(6):331-7.
Epileptic seizures account for 30-40% of the visits to our department. A retrospective study was conducted in an attempt to classify epileptic syndromes and seizures according to the classification developed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE).
The aim of this study was to verify the applicability of the ILAE's international classification in our population and to analyse the quality of the information contained in the clinical records, thus confirming the importance of having a standardised clinical record.
The clinical records of 352 children aged between 0 and 14 years, between 2000 and 2001, were analysed. The eligibility criterion was determined by the reason for visiting: epilepsy or seizures with an epileptic mechanism. Data was collected according to a protocol that was drawn up for this purpose.
Of the 352 cases, 21.3% had febrile seizures; 13.6% had a single seizure; 4.5% had neonatal convulsions; 54.5% were cases of epilepsy and 6% could not be analysed due to a shortage of data. In all, 192 clinical records that satisfied the definition of epilepsy were analysed. Partial epilepsies accounted for 55%, 23% were symptomatic and 2% were cryptogenetic. It was found that 10% of the generalised epilepsies were idiopathic.
Despite the shortcomings in the documentation, the international classification was applicable to our population, as has been the case in other centres. Nevertheless, we came up against some problems, and therefore include some of the more notable points from the current discussion about classifications. We highlight the need to establish a standardised clinical record and to use computer systems to record epileptic patients. Although there were certain limitations, 81.3% of the epilepsies were classified and we therefore give some consideration to the new proposals for classification.
癫痫发作占我院门诊量的30 - 40%。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,旨在根据国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)制定的分类方法对癫痫综合征和发作进行分类。
本研究的目的是验证ILAE国际分类在我们的患者群体中的适用性,并分析临床记录中所含信息的质量,从而证实拥有标准化临床记录的重要性。
分析了2000年至2001年间352例0至14岁儿童的临床记录。入选标准由就诊原因确定:癫痫或具有癫痫机制的发作。数据是根据为此目的制定的方案收集的。
在352例病例中,21.3%为热性惊厥;13.6%为单次发作;4.5%为新生儿惊厥;54.5%为癫痫病例,6%因数据不足无法分析。总共分析了192份符合癫痫定义的临床记录。部分性癫痫占55%,症状性癫痫占23%,隐源性癫痫占2%。发现全身性癫痫中有10%为特发性。
尽管文档存在不足,但国际分类在我们的患者群体中是适用的,其他中心也是如此。然而,我们遇到了一些问题,因此纳入了当前关于分类讨论中的一些更值得注意的要点。我们强调需要建立标准化临床记录并使用计算机系统记录癫痫患者。尽管存在一定局限性,但81.3%的癫痫得到了分类,因此我们对新的分类建议进行了一些思考。