Day Brian
University of British Columbia, Department of Orthopaedics, 2836 Ash Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 3C6, Canada.
Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Oct;36(4):413-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.06.003.
The evidence supporting the therapeutic value of arthroscopic debridement of the knee is overwhelming. However, there is a need for better-designed clinical trials comparing arthroscopic debridement to established alternative treatments. The most important factor in determining success is proper patient selection, and many who have osteoarthritis of the knee will not benefit from arthroscopic debridement. Patients who have end-stage osteoarthritis or severe malalignment and those who do not have mechanical symptoms are unlikely to improve. The important considerations are how effective the treatment is and whether the expected benefits justify the risks, potential complications, and cost. An objective analysis of outcome studies in patients who have osteoarthritis of the knee joint clearly shows that properly selected patients will benefit greatly from arthroscopic debridement and many will be saved from the increased morbidity and potential complications of alternative treatments.
支持膝关节镜下清创术治疗价值的证据极为充分。然而,需要设计更优的临床试验,将关节镜下清创术与已确立的替代治疗方法进行比较。决定手术成功的最重要因素是正确选择患者,许多膝关节骨关节炎患者无法从关节镜下清创术中获益。处于终末期骨关节炎或严重关节排列不齐的患者以及没有机械性症状的患者不太可能改善病情。重要的考量因素是治疗效果如何,以及预期益处是否能抵消风险、潜在并发症和成本。对膝关节骨关节炎患者结局研究的客观分析清楚表明,正确选择的患者将从关节镜下清创术中大大获益,许多患者可避免替代治疗带来的更高发病率和潜在并发症。