Suppr超能文献

[构成内镜检查阴性反流性疾病的不同群体的患病率]

[Prevalence of different groups that comprise endoscopy-negative reflux disease].

作者信息

Carmona-Sánchez Ramón, Solana-Sentíes Sergio, Esmer-Sánchez David, Tostado-Fernández José Fernando Alvarez

机构信息

Servicio de Gastroenterología, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Centro Médico del Potosí, San Luis Potosí, México.

出版信息

Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2005 Jan-Mar;70(1):6-13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND DATA

Endoscopic-negative reflux disease (ENRD) is a heterogeneous population. There are few data regarding the prevalenece of each group and subgroups that constitutes ENRD population.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of the differents groups and subgroups in ENRD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied consecutive patients with frequent heartburn and acid regurgitation with endoscopically normal esophageal mucosa in whom ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring was performed. According with the pH-testing data and the correlation between symptoms and the acid reflux events, the subjects were classified in two groups: non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) and functional heartburn. The functional heartburn group was splited in 3 subgroups: asymptomatics during pH-monitoring, hipersensitive esophagus and those with physiologic reflux with negative association between symptoms and acid reflux events. These last subgroup was classified in: minute changes of intra-esophegeal pH (upper than 4, n = 19) and non-acid related stimuli.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven patients with ENRD were classified in NERD (28%, n = 31) and functional heartburn (72%, n = 80). Patients with functional heartburn were classified in asymptomatics during pH-monitoring (11%, n = 12), hipersensitive esophagus (9%, n = 10) and those with physiologic reflux with negative association between symptoms and acid reflux events (52%, n = 58). In these last subgroup 19 (17%) patients were classified as minute changes of intra-esophegeal pH (upper than 4) and 39 (35%) as non-acid related stimuli.

CONCLUSIONS

Even most of the patients with ENRD have normal ambulatory pH-test, their symptoms are related with drops of esophageal pH in 26% of the cases. Eleven percent do not have symptoms during ambulatory pH-monitoring.

摘要

背景数据

内镜检查阴性的反流性疾病(ENRD)是一个异质性群体。关于构成ENRD群体的各个组和亚组的患病率的数据很少。

目的

描述ENRD中不同组和亚组的患病率。

患者和方法

我们研究了连续的有频繁烧心和反酸症状且食管黏膜内镜检查正常的患者,对其进行了24小时动态食管pH监测。根据pH测试数据以及症状与酸反流事件之间的相关性,将受试者分为两组:非糜烂性胃食管反流病(NERD)和功能性烧心。功能性烧心组又分为3个亚组:pH监测期间无症状者、食管高敏者以及症状与酸反流事件呈负相关的生理性反流者。最后这个亚组又分为:食管内pH微小变化(高于4,n = 19)和非酸相关刺激者。

结果

111例ENRD患者被分为NERD(28%,n = 31)和功能性烧心(72%,n = 80)。功能性烧心患者分为pH监测期间无症状者(11%,n = 12)、食管高敏者(9%,n = 10)以及症状与酸反流事件呈负相关的生理性反流者(52%,n = 58)。在最后这个亚组中,19例(17%)患者被分类为食管内pH微小变化(高于4),39例(35%)为非酸相关刺激者。

结论

即使大多数ENRD患者动态pH测试正常,但在26%的病例中其症状与食管pH下降有关。11%的患者在动态pH监测期间没有症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验