De Santo L S, Romano G, Mastroianni C, Roberta C, Della Corte A, Amarelli C, Maiello C, Giannolo B, Marra C, Ragone E, Grimaldi M, Utili R, Scardone M, Cotrufo M
Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences, Second University of Naples, V. Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Transplant Proc. 2005 Jul-Aug;37(6):2684-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.06.080.
This retrospective single-center report sought to evaluate the relation of immunosuppressive regimen with the incidence and characteristics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection from 1999 to 2003.
Immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), azathioprine (AZA), and prednisolone associated with either thymoglobulin or ATG high-dosage induction from 1999 to 2000 (AZA, 64 patients [AZA-Thymo = 38 patients and AZA-ATG 26 patients]), or cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisolone with low-dose thymoglobulin induction from 2001 onward (n = 52 patients). Ganciclovir preemptive therapy was guided by pp65 antigenemia monitoring without CMV prophylaxis.
The study groups were homogeneous with respect to major perioperative risk factors. Comparing the two AZA subgroups no difference emerged as to percentage of pp65 antigenemia-positive, preemptively treated patients reflecting CMV disease incidence and relapses. AZA-Thymo patient showed significantly shorter time to first positive pp65-antigenemia and higher viral load (AZA-Thymo vs AZA-ATG, P = .004 and P = .009). The two subgroups did not differ with regard to incidence of rejection, superinfection, and graft coronary disease. By shifting from AZA to MMF no difference emerged as to incidence and characteristics of CMV infections, but there was a significant reduction in acute rejection and superinfection (AZA vs MMF P = .001 and P = .008).
The distinct immunological properties of thymoglobulin versus ATG significantly altered the pattern of CMV expression. MMF with reduced-dose induction did not engender a higher CMV morbidity.
本回顾性单中心报告旨在评估1999年至2003年免疫抑制方案与巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的发生率及特征之间的关系。
免疫抑制方案包括1999年至2000年使用环孢素微乳剂(新山地明)、硫唑嘌呤(AZA)和泼尼松龙,并联合使用抗胸腺细胞球蛋白或高剂量抗胸腺细胞球蛋白进行诱导治疗(AZA组,64例患者[AZA-抗胸腺细胞球蛋白组=38例患者,AZA-抗胸腺细胞球蛋白组26例患者]),或从2001年起使用环孢素微乳剂(新山地明)、霉酚酸酯(MMF)和泼尼松龙,并联合低剂量抗胸腺细胞球蛋白进行诱导治疗(n = 52例患者)。更昔洛韦抢先治疗以pp65抗原血症监测为指导,不进行CMV预防。
研究组在主要围手术期危险因素方面具有同质性。比较两个AZA亚组,在反映CMV疾病发生率和复发率的pp65抗原血症阳性且接受抢先治疗的患者百分比方面没有差异。AZA-抗胸腺细胞球蛋白组患者首次出现pp65抗原血症阳性的时间明显更短,病毒载量更高(AZA-抗胸腺细胞球蛋白组与AZA-抗胸腺细胞球蛋白组相比,P = .004和P = .009)。两个亚组在排斥反应、重叠感染和移植冠状动脉疾病的发生率方面没有差异。从AZA转换为MMF后,CMV感染的发生率和特征没有差异,但急性排斥反应和重叠感染显著减少(AZA组与MMF组相比,P = .001和P = .008)。
抗胸腺细胞球蛋白与抗胸腺细胞球蛋白不同的免疫学特性显著改变了CMV的表达模式。低剂量诱导的MMF不会导致更高的CMV发病率。