Sebrié E M, Barnoya J, Pérez-Stable E J, Glantz S A
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Tob Control. 2005 Oct;14(5):e2. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.011130.
To evaluate how transnational tobacco companies, working through their local affiliates, influenced tobacco control policymaking in Argentina between 1966 and 2005.
Analysis of internal tobacco industry documents, local newspapers and magazines, internet resources, bills from the Argentinean National Congress Library, and interviews with key individuals in Argentina.
Transnational tobacco companies (Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco, Lorillard, and RJ Reynolds International) have been actively influencing public health policymaking in Argentina since the early 1970s. As in other countries, in 1977 the tobacco industry created a weak voluntary self regulating code to avoid strong legislated restrictions on advertising. In addition to direct lobbying by the tobacco companies, these efforts involved use of third party allies, public relations campaigns, and scientific and medical consultants. During the 1980s and 1990s efforts to pass comprehensive tobacco control legislation intensified, but the organised tobacco industry prevented its enactment. There has been no national activity to decrease exposure to secondhand smoke.
The tobacco industry, working through its local subsidiaries, has subverted meaningful tobacco control legislation in Argentina using the same strategies as in the USA and other countries. As a result, tobacco control in Argentina remains governed by a national law that is weak and restricted in its scope.
评估跨国烟草公司通过其当地子公司,在1966年至2005年期间如何影响阿根廷的烟草控制政策制定。
分析烟草行业内部文件、当地报纸和杂志、网络资源、阿根廷国民议会图书馆的法案,并采访阿根廷的关键人物。
自20世纪70年代初以来,跨国烟草公司(菲利普·莫里斯国际公司、英美烟草公司、罗瑞拉德公司和雷诺国际公司)一直在积极影响阿根廷的公共卫生政策制定。与其他国家一样,1977年烟草行业制定了一项宽松的自愿自我监管准则,以避免对广告进行严格的立法限制。除了烟草公司的直接游说外,这些努力还包括利用第三方盟友、公关活动以及科学和医学顾问。在20世纪80年代和90年代,通过全面烟草控制立法的努力加强,但有组织的烟草行业阻止了其颁布。目前没有全国性的减少二手烟暴露的行动。
烟草行业通过其当地子公司,采用与美国和其他国家相同的策略,颠覆了阿根廷有意义的烟草控制立法。结果,阿根廷的烟草控制仍然受一部薄弱且范围有限的国家法律管辖。