Suppr超能文献

新的研究伦理:监督要求会使法医研究陷入困境吗?

The new research ethic: will oversight requirements sink forensic research?

作者信息

Candilis Philip J, Arikan Rasim, Noone Sheila B, Holzer Jacob C

机构信息

University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(3):361-7.

Abstract

The conduct of research with human participants is facing increased scrutiny from government, media, and academic sources. Research oversight is consequently increasing dramatically as education and accreditation movements gain momentum. Institutional review boards themselves are undergoing significant changes in organization and accountability, implementing new tools to monitor investigator compliance. This article describes the causes of recent calls for increased scrutiny, the resultant trends in research oversight, and the general lack of preparation for increased costs in the public sector. These are costs that will be felt acutely in the forensic setting as diminishing state budgets affect hospitals, universities, and correctional institutions.

摘要

涉及人类受试者的研究正面临来自政府、媒体和学术机构越来越多的审查。随着教育和认证活动的蓬勃发展,研究监督也因此急剧增加。机构审查委员会自身在组织和问责方面正经历重大变革,采用新工具来监测研究者的合规情况。本文描述了近期要求加强审查的原因、研究监督的相应趋势,以及公共部门对成本增加普遍缺乏准备的情况。随着州预算减少影响到医院、大学和惩教机构,这些成本在法医环境中将被深切感受到。

相似文献

3
Changing the paradigm: new directions in federal oversight of human research.转变范式:联邦政府对人体研究监管的新方向
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003 Nov-Dec;37 Suppl 1:S2-6. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200311001-00002.

本文引用的文献

3
The cost of operating institutional review boards (IRBs).机构审查委员会(IRB)的运作成本。
Acad Med. 2003 Jun;78(6):638-44. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200306000-00019.
9
IRBs under the microscope.接受审视的机构审查委员会
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998 Sep;8(3):329-37. doi: 10.1353/ken.1998.0022.
10
The biotech death of Jesse Gelsinger.
N Y Times Mag. 1999 Nov 28:136-140, 149-150.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验