Candilis Philip J, Arikan Rasim, Noone Sheila B, Holzer Jacob C
University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(3):361-7.
The conduct of research with human participants is facing increased scrutiny from government, media, and academic sources. Research oversight is consequently increasing dramatically as education and accreditation movements gain momentum. Institutional review boards themselves are undergoing significant changes in organization and accountability, implementing new tools to monitor investigator compliance. This article describes the causes of recent calls for increased scrutiny, the resultant trends in research oversight, and the general lack of preparation for increased costs in the public sector. These are costs that will be felt acutely in the forensic setting as diminishing state budgets affect hospitals, universities, and correctional institutions.
涉及人类受试者的研究正面临来自政府、媒体和学术机构越来越多的审查。随着教育和认证活动的蓬勃发展,研究监督也因此急剧增加。机构审查委员会自身在组织和问责方面正经历重大变革,采用新工具来监测研究者的合规情况。本文描述了近期要求加强审查的原因、研究监督的相应趋势,以及公共部门对成本增加普遍缺乏准备的情况。随着州预算减少影响到医院、大学和惩教机构,这些成本在法医环境中将被深切感受到。