Spásová I
Pneumologická klinika 2, LF UK a FNM, Praha.
Cas Lek Cesk. 2005;144(9):602-12; discussion 612-3.
In recent years, treatment of the locally advanced unresectable Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has evolved from the radiotherapy alone to sequential therapy settings with induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. During recent years, concomitant chemoradiotherapy has become the standard treatment for these patients. The addition of chemotherapy during the course of radiotherapy provides better locoregional control of the disease by killing the radioresistant cells, inhibition of the reparation processes in the sublethally damaged cells and accumulation of the cells in the G2/M phase, when the cells are sensitive to radiation. It also reduces the spread of the micrometastases. Administration of cisplatin-based regimens appears to be the most effective. Acute pneumonias can be effectively suppressed by amifostine administration. Locally advanced inoperable NSCLC can be cured by chemoradiotherapy in more than 10% of patients. Fractionation radiotherapy does not yield prolonged survival. Currently the other clinical studies investigating the effects of hyperfractionation, 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT (intense modified radiotherapy) are being conducted. Also the role of various radiosensitizing agents is currently under clinical evaluation. The results of a study, comparing various doublet combinations of taxanes and gemcitabine with cisplatin or carboplatin demonstrate, that as for the efficacy, the standard doublet regimens reached a certain plateau and that they prolong the survival in comparison with the standard regimens used before 1990. The only statistically significant difference in the efficacy among the individual treatment arms is the significantly longer time to the progressive disease in the arm treated by gemcitabine and cisplatin. Studies with triplet regimens show that the addition of the third cytotoxic agent might increase the overall response rate with the increase of toxicity and only a very small survival benefit. The replacement of the platinum derivate by some of the new cytotoxic agents does not appear to yield lower efficacy and also shows a more favorable toxicity profile; it is, however, significantly more expensive. Overall differences among the cytostatic combinations based on cisplatin in comparison with combinations based on carboplatin are not very distinct. Nevertheless, the combination of cisplatin with third generation cytotoxic agents is recommendable as it is more effective for patients with advanced NSCLC without renal impairment and with adequate bone marrow reserve. A high percentage of patients with NSCLC are older that 70 and this percentage will increase further. Earlier, chemotherapy was not used for these patients with the explanation that elderly people are usually polymorbid and the function of their organs which metabolize the cytostatics is reduced. However, a survival benefit in elderly patients treated by cytotoxic monotherapy was proven in comparison with the best supportive care. Other studies, however, found significant differences neither in toxicity nor in survival in comparison with younger patients, when using the same treatment regimens. Platinum doublets, based namely on carboplatin, are useful for patients older than 70, who are in good clinical condition. In the second-line therapy of NSCLC pemetrexed demonstrates identical efficacy as docetaxel, which is considered as a standard monotherapy in the second-line treatment of NSCLC. Moreover, pemetrexed is associated with less toxicity. These data show that in future, pemetrexed may become the standard treatment for second-line therapy of NSCLC. In patients with stage IIIB/IV of NSCLC, the addition of biological treatment to standard doublet cytostatic combination does not bring any survival benefit. In future, more detailed attention should be paid to selection of the patients for this treatment modality. When comparing survival time by meta-analysis, significantly longer survival time of the patients treated with gemcitabine combination was found in comparison with other treatment. Similarly, the progression-free survival is significantly longer in the patients treated with gemcitabine containing regimen. This data has proven good clinical efficacy of gemcitabine in the first-line therapy of advanced NSCLC.
近年来,局部晚期不可切除的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗已从单纯放疗发展为诱导化疗后放疗的序贯治疗模式。近年来,同步放化疗已成为这些患者的标准治疗方法。在放疗过程中加入化疗,通过杀死放射抗拒细胞、抑制亚致死性损伤细胞的修复过程以及使细胞积聚在对辐射敏感的G2/M期,从而更好地实现对疾病的局部区域控制。它还能减少微转移的扩散。基于顺铂的方案给药似乎最为有效。氨磷汀给药可有效抑制急性肺炎。超过10%的局部晚期无法手术切除的NSCLC患者可通过放化疗治愈。分割放疗并不能延长生存期。目前正在进行其他关于超分割放疗、三维适形放疗和调强放疗(IMRT)效果的临床研究。各种放射增敏剂的作用目前也正在进行临床评估。一项比较紫杉烷和吉西他滨与顺铂或卡铂的各种双联组合的研究结果表明,就疗效而言,标准双联方案已达到一定的平台期,并且与1990年以前使用的标准方案相比,它们延长了生存期。各治疗组之间在疗效上唯一具有统计学意义的差异是吉西他滨和顺铂治疗组的疾病进展时间显著更长。三联方案的研究表明,添加第三种细胞毒性药物可能会提高总体缓解率,但毒性增加,且生存获益非常小。用一些新的细胞毒性药物替代铂类衍生物似乎不会降低疗效,而且毒性特征更有利;然而,其费用要高得多。与基于卡铂的组合相比,基于顺铂的细胞毒性组合之间的总体差异不是很明显。尽管如此,顺铂与第三代细胞毒性药物的组合是推荐的,因为它对无肾功能损害且骨髓储备充足的晚期NSCLC患者更有效。高比例的NSCLC患者年龄在70岁以上,且这一比例还将进一步增加。早些时候,这些患者不使用化疗,理由是老年人通常患有多种疾病,其代谢细胞毒性药物的器官功能会降低。然而,与最佳支持治疗相比,细胞毒性单药治疗在老年患者中已被证明具有生存获益。然而,其他研究发现,在使用相同治疗方案时,与年轻患者相比,在毒性和生存方面均无显著差异。基于卡铂的铂类双联方案对临床状况良好的70岁以上患者有用。在NSCLC的二线治疗中,培美曲塞显示出与多西他赛相同的疗效,多西他赛被认为是NSCLC二线治疗的标准单药治疗。此外,培美曲塞的毒性较小。这些数据表明,未来培美曲塞可能成为NSCLC二线治疗的标准疗法。在NSCLC IIIB/IV期患者中,在标准双联细胞毒性组合中加入生物治疗并不能带来任何生存获益。未来,应更加详细地关注该治疗方式患者的选择。通过荟萃分析比较生存时间时,发现接受吉西他滨组合治疗的患者生存时间明显长于其他治疗。同样,接受含吉西他滨方案治疗的患者无进展生存期明显更长。这些数据已证明吉西他滨在晚期NSCLC一线治疗中具有良好的临床疗效。