Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement?
作者信息
Thomson R G
机构信息
National Patient Safety Agency, Newcastle upon Tyne Medical School, UK.
出版信息
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):317-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015727.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):317-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015727.
2
Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):314. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016311.
3
Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):315-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015669.
4
[From quality cycles to evidence-based clinical practice--status articles on quality development. II. Clinical guidelines].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Nov 16;160(47):6806-10.
5
Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):152-3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018432.
6
[Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Apr 4;167(14):1520-2.
7
CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):681-5; discussion 686. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.010.
8
[Individual therapy 1. External validation of randomized controlled studies. "When is the publication of these studies feasible?"].
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(4):303-17.
9
A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.027.
10
The STROBE initiative and its implications for dental public health research.
Community Dent Health. 2007 Dec;24(4):194-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Systematic review of conceptual criticisms of homeopathy.
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 21;9(11):e21287. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21287. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
No respect: research in quality, safety, and process improvement.
Perm J. 2009 Fall;13(4):68-71. doi: 10.7812/TPP/09-042.
3
Ethical issues in using data from quality management programs.
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):321-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0972-2. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
4
Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project.
BMJ. 2009 Jan 19;338:a3152. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3152.
5
Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Oct;17 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i3-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029066.
6
Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):2125-30. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0797-4. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
7
Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):152-3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018432.
Zotero 插件