Tamhane Amol, Vajpayee Rasik B, Biswas Nihar R, Pandey Ravindra M, Sharma Namrata, Titiyal Jeewan S, Tandon Radhika
Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ophthalmology. 2005 Nov;112(11):1963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.022. Epub 2005 Sep 29.
To evaluate the role of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in acute ocular burns.
Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Patients with grade II to IV ocular burns within 3 weeks of injury were recruited. Thirty-seven patients, 7 of whom had bilateral involvement (total, 44 eyes), participated in the trial. Twenty eyes were included in group A (AMT) and 24 eyes were included in group B (controls).
The eyes in the AMT group underwent AMT in addition to conventional medical therapy. In the control group, only conventional medical therapy was instituted.
The patients' subjective assessments of relief of ocular discomfort, healing of the corneal epithelial defect, visual acuity, extent of corneal vascularization, formation of symblepharon, and tear function tests.
At day 1, subjective ocular discomfort scores were reduced significantly in eyes with moderate burns in the AMT group compared with controls (P = 0.05), but there was no difference between the 2 groups in eyes with severe burns. The log mean percentage reduction in size of epithelial defect by day 7 was 7.43+/-0.89 after AMT and 6.23+/-1.10 with medical treatment alone in moderate grade burns at day 7 (P = 0.01), but there was no difference between the 2 groups in eyes with severe burns. There was no overall difference in the final visual acuity, symblepharon formation, corneal vascularization, and tear function tests between the 2 groups over the next 3 months and further follow-up. There was a high dropout rate for long-term follow-up.
Amniotic membrane transplantation in eyes with acute ocular burns has advantages in terms of reduction of pain and promotion of early epithelialization in patients with moderate grade burns, but not so in severe burns. There seems to be no definite advantage to AMT over medical therapy alone in terms of improvement in visual acuity, appearance of symblepharon, corneal vascularization, and results of tear function tests on short-term follow-up.
评估羊膜移植(AMT)在急性眼烧伤中的作用。
前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。
招募受伤3周内的Ⅱ至Ⅳ级眼烧伤患者。37例患者参与试验,其中7例为双眼受累(共44只眼)。A组(AMT组)纳入20只眼,B组(对照组)纳入24只眼。
AMT组的眼除接受常规药物治疗外还接受AMT。对照组仅采用常规药物治疗。
患者对眼不适缓解情况、角膜上皮缺损愈合情况、视力、角膜血管化程度、睑球粘连形成情况以及泪液功能测试的主观评估。
第1天,与对照组相比,AMT组中度烧伤眼的主观眼不适评分显著降低(P = 0.05),但重度烧伤眼两组间无差异。第7天,中度烧伤时,AMT后上皮缺损面积对数平均减少百分比为7.43±0.89,单纯药物治疗为6.23±1.10(P = 0.01),但重度烧伤眼两组间无差异。在接下来的3个月及进一步随访中,两组在最终视力、睑球粘连形成、角膜血管化及泪液功能测试方面无总体差异。长期随访的失访率较高。
急性眼烧伤患者中,羊膜移植在减轻中度烧伤患者疼痛及促进早期上皮化方面具有优势,但对重度烧伤患者则不然。在短期随访中,就视力改善、睑球粘连外观、角膜血管化及泪液功能测试结果而言,AMT似乎并不比单纯药物治疗有明确优势。