Edwards David A, Kim Jimok, Alger Bradley E
Department of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W. Baltimore St., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jan;95(1):67-75. doi: 10.1152/jn.00813.2005. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
Endocannabinoids (eCBs) act as retrograde messengers at inhibitory synapses of the hippocampal CA1 region. Current models place eCB synthesis in the postsynaptic pyramidal cell and the site of eCB action at cannabinoid receptors located on presynaptic interneuron terminals. Four responses at the CA1-interneuron synapse are attributed to eCBs: depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI), G-protein-coupled receptor-mediated enhancement of DSI (DeltaDSI), persistent suppression of evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (eIPSCs), and finally, mGluR-dependent long-term depression (iLTD). It has been proposed that all are mediated by the eCB, 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, yet there is evidence that DSI does not arise from the same underlying biochemical processes as the other responses. In view of the increasing importance of eCB effects in the brain, it will be essential to understand the mechanisms by which eCB effects are produced. Our results reveal new differences in the biochemical pathways by which the eCB-dependent responses are initiated. Both U73122, a phospholipase C antagonist, and RHC-80267, a diacylglycerol (DAG) lipase antagonist, prevented eCB-dependent iLTD induction by 3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG). However, mAChR activation does not cause eCB-dependent iLTD. Neither enzyme inhibitor affects DSI, and persistent eCB-dependent eIPSC suppression induced by either mGluRs or mAChRs is unaffected by U73122. On the other hand, inhibition of DAG lipase prevents persistent eCB-dependent eIPSC suppression triggered by mAChRs. The results show that the biochemical pathways for the various eCB-dependent responses differ and might therefore be independently manipulated.
内源性大麻素(eCBs)在海马CA1区的抑制性突触处作为逆行信使发挥作用。目前的模型认为eCB的合成发生在突触后锥体细胞中,而eCB的作用位点是位于突触前中间神经元终末上的大麻素受体。CA1中间神经元突触处的四种反应归因于eCBs:去极化诱导的抑制作用减弱(DSI)、G蛋白偶联受体介导的DSI增强(DeltaDSI)、诱发抑制性突触后电流(eIPSCs)的持续抑制,以及最后,代谢型谷氨酸受体(mGluR)依赖性长时程抑制(iLTD)。有人提出所有这些反应均由eCB 2-花生四烯酸甘油酯介导,但有证据表明DSI并非源于与其他反应相同的潜在生化过程。鉴于eCB效应在大脑中的重要性日益增加,了解产生eCB效应的机制至关重要。我们的结果揭示了启动eCB依赖性反应的生化途径中的新差异。磷脂酶C拮抗剂U73122和二酰基甘油(DAG)脂肪酶拮抗剂RHC-80267均可阻止3,5-二羟基苯甘氨酸(DHPG)诱导的eCB依赖性iLTD。然而,毒蕈碱型乙酰胆碱受体(mAChR)激活不会引起eCB依赖性iLTD。这两种酶抑制剂均不影响DSI,并且由mGluRs或mAChRs诱导的持续的eCB依赖性eIPSC抑制不受U73122影响。另一方面,抑制DAG脂肪酶可阻止由mAChRs触发的持续的eCB依赖性eIPSC抑制。结果表明,各种eCB依赖性反应的生化途径不同,因此可能被独立操控。