Fernández Landaluce A, Andrés Olaizola A, Mora González E, Azkunaga Santibáñez B, Mintegi Raso S, Benito Fernández J
Urgencias de Pediatría, Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao, Spain.
An Pediatr (Barc). 2005 Oct;63(4):314-20. doi: 10.1157/13079814.
To determine the applicability and utility of a telephone triage performed by physicians in a pediatric emergency department (PED).
All the telephone consultations registered between 2003-10-1 and 2004-10-3 were reviewed. The variables analyzed were: telephone call record (n = 2,560), compliance with the advice given (randomized sample of patients who were not referred to the PED and all patients who were referred) and parent satisfaction (callers over a 1-month period were contacted). A protocol for answering queries was organized and residents received specific training.
There were 59,088 episodes and 2,560 calls were registered (1 call/23 episodes). Forty-eight percent of the calls were received between 5 and 11 pm. All calls were answered by a physician (72% residents, 28% attending physicians). The most frequent reason for calling was to seek advice on symptoms. Eighty-two percent of the calls were resolved through telephone instructions to be carried out in the home. A total of 274 patients were advised to attend the PED, but 29% did not attend, usually because the child's symptoms improved. Twenty patients were admitted to the hospital (6 to wards, 14 to the observation unit). Of the patients not advised to attend, 21% attended the PED and 0.9% were admitted (compared with 7.2% in the referral group, p = 0.0001). More than 90% of the families questioned were satisfied with the advice given. Seventy-five percent would have attended the PED if telephone consultation had not been available. By giving telephone advice, we avoided 115 visits in 1 month.
If special training programs and answering systems are established after a training period, telephone consultation in a PED is a safe and useful method of performing patient triage. Satisfaction among families was high.
确定儿科急诊科(PED)医生进行电话分诊的适用性和实用性。
回顾了2003年10月1日至2004年10月3日期间登记的所有电话咨询。分析的变量包括:电话记录(n = 2560)、对所给建议的依从性(未被转诊至PED的患者随机样本以及所有被转诊的患者)和家长满意度(联系了1个月内的来电者)。制定了回答问题的方案,住院医师接受了专门培训。
共有59088次就诊,登记了2560个电话(1个电话/23次就诊)。48%的电话在下午5点至晚上11点之间接到。所有电话均由医生接听(72%为住院医师,28%为主治医师)。打电话最常见的原因是就症状寻求建议。82%的电话通过在家执行的电话指导得到解决。共有274名患者被建议前往PED就诊,但29%未就诊,通常是因为孩子的症状有所改善。20名患者入院(6名入病房,14名入观察室)。在未被建议就诊的患者中,21%前往了PED,0.9%入院(转诊组为7.2%,p = 0.0001)。超过90%接受询问的家庭对所给建议满意。如果没有电话咨询,75%的家庭会前往PED就诊。通过提供电话建议,我们在1个月内避免了115次就诊。
如果在培训期后建立特殊培训项目和接听系统,PED的电话咨询是一种安全且有用的患者分诊方法。家庭满意度较高。