Su Chih-Ying, Tsai Shang-Shyue, Chuang Hui-Ching, Chiu Jeng-Fen
Department of Otolaryngology and voice center, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical Center, Taiwan.
Laryngoscope. 2005 Oct;115(10):1752-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000172203.28583.63.
In the treatment of unilateral paralytic dysphonia, traditional arytenoid adduction is designed to place suture through the muscular process of the arytenoid attaching anteriorly to the thyroid ala. In contrast with the suture direction of this technique, a new paramedian approach to arytenoid adduction anchors anteroinferiorly to the cricoid cartilage, mimicking the force action of the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle (the major adductor of the larynx). This study investigated the influence of these changes in suture direction on the vocal fold level as well as the vocal outcomes in these two techniques of arytenoid adduction.
A prospective clinical series.
Thirty patients with unilateral paralytic dysphonia underwent medialization laryngoplasty with arytenoid adduction and strap muscle transposition. Under local anesthesia, the thyroid lamina on the involved side was paramedially separated. The inner perichondrium was carefully elevated away from the overlying thyroid cartilage, carrying the dissection posteriorly to the level of the superior and inferior cornua. The lamina was retracted laterally, the inner perichondrium was opened near the midpoint, and the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle identified. Tracing the muscle fibers posterosuperiorly, the muscular process of the arytenoid was identified. A 2-0 Prolene suture was placed through the muscular process and temporarily tied to the anterolateral aspect of the thyroid ala (AA-thyroid suture). Intraoperative acoustic and perceptual assessments were performed. After releasing the tie, the suture was anchored to the cricoid cartilage at the origin of the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle (AA-cricoid suture). Voice assessments were repeated, and the outcomes of the two tests were compared. The choice of the type of arytenoid adduction suture was made intraoperatively according to which condition provided better vocal performance. After securing the suture, a bipedicled strap muscle flap was transposed into the space between the lamina and inner perichondrium and the thyroid cartilages sutured back into place.
The intraoperative acoustic and perceptual assessments revealed the vocal performance was significantly better with AA-cricoid suture than the AA-thyroid suture in this series. No major complications occurred in the study.
This study suggests that arytenoid adduction with suture attachment along the longitudinal axis of the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle to the cricoid cartilage is more physiologic and effective than that attaching the suture to the thyroid ala. A paramedian approach to arytenoid adduction with or without strap muscle transposition is a safe and effective method for treatment of unilateral paralytic dysphonia.
在单侧麻痹性发音障碍的治疗中,传统的杓状软骨内收术是将缝线穿过杓状软骨的肌突并向前固定于甲状软骨翼板。与该技术的缝线方向不同,一种新的经中旁入路杓状软骨内收术是将缝线在杓状软骨前下方固定于环状软骨,模拟环杓侧肌(喉部主要的内收肌)的作用力。本研究调查了缝线方向的这些改变对声带水平的影响以及这两种杓状软骨内收术的发声效果。
前瞻性临床系列研究。
30例单侧麻痹性发音障碍患者接受了杓状软骨内收和带状肌移位的喉内移植物成形术。在局部麻醉下,将患侧甲状软骨板经中旁分离。小心地将内层软骨膜从上方的甲状软骨上抬起,将分离操作向后延伸至甲状软骨上角和下角水平。将甲状软骨板向外侧牵拉,在中点附近切开内层软骨膜,识别环杓侧肌。沿肌纤维向后上方追踪,识别杓状软骨的肌突。用一根2-0聚丙烯缝线穿过肌突并暂时系于甲状软骨翼板的前外侧(AA-甲状软骨缝线)。进行术中声学和感知评估。松开结扎线后,将缝线固定于环杓侧肌起点处的环状软骨上(AA-环状软骨缝线)。重复进行嗓音评估,并比较两次测试的结果。术中根据哪种情况能提供更好的发声表现来选择杓状软骨内收缝线的类型。固定好缝线后,将双蒂带状肌瓣移位至甲状软骨板与内层软骨膜之间的间隙,将甲状软骨缝合回原位。
本系列研究中,术中声学和感知评估显示AA-环状软骨缝线的发声表现明显优于AA-甲状软骨缝线。研究中未发生重大并发症。
本研究表明,将缝线沿着环杓侧肌的纵轴固定于环状软骨的杓状软骨内收术比将缝线固定于甲状软骨翼板更符合生理且更有效。经中旁入路的杓状软骨内收术,无论是否进行带状肌移位,都是治疗单侧麻痹性发音障碍的一种安全有效的方法。