Michael M, Wirth A, Ball D L, MacManus M, Rischin D, Mileshkin L, Solomon B, McKendrick J, Milner A D
The Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St, Victoria 8006, Australia.
Br J Cancer. 2005 Sep 19;93(6):652-61. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602759.
The role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) unsuitable for radical therapy but who require locoregional treatment has not been defined. The aims of this phase I trial were thus to develop a novel regimen of weekly chemotherapy concurrent with high-dose palliative RT (40 Gy/20 fractions) and assess its tolerability, objective and symptomatic response rates. Eligible patients had stage I-IIIB NSCLC unsuitable for radical RT or limited stage IV disease, ECOG PS<or=1 and required locoregional therapy. Treatment was RT (40 Gy/20 fractions/5 per week) and weekly Vinorelbine plus Cisplatin escalated in six planned dose levels (DLs). At 4 weeks post-RT, patients received two cycles of Cisplatin 80 mg m-2 day 1+Vinorelbine 25 mg m-2 days 1, 8, 15. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined in the CRT phase. Disease-related symptoms were assessed by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. In all, 24 patients accrued, stage IIIB (n=12) and IV disease (n=10). The highest administered dose was at DL 4, Vinorelbine 30 mg m-2+Cisplatin 20 mg m-2 with DLTs of grade 4 neutropenia in two of three patients. No grade 3 or 4 nonhaematological toxicities were observed. The overall radiological response rate was 65% (n=23: complete response 4% and partial response 61%) and infield FDG-PET responses were seen in 89% (n=18). There was an improvement or stabilisation of symptoms and quality of life. Dose level 3, Vinorelbine 25 mg m-2+Cisplatin 20 mg m-2, is recommended for further assessment. This regimen was tolerable and produced meaningful responses for patients for whom locoregional control is required, but who are unsuitable for radical CRT.
同步放化疗(CRT)在不适于根治性治疗但需要局部区域治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的作用尚未明确。因此,这项I期试验的目的是开发一种每周化疗与大剂量姑息性放疗(40 Gy/20次分割)同步进行的新方案,并评估其耐受性、客观缓解率和症状缓解率。符合条件的患者为I-IIIB期NSCLC,不适于根治性放疗或局限期IV期疾病,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分(PS)≤1且需要局部区域治疗。治疗方案为放疗(40 Gy/20次分割/每周5次),以及每周使用长春瑞滨加顺铂,并按六个计划剂量水平(DLs)递增。放疗后4周,患者接受两个周期的顺铂80 mg/m²第1天+长春瑞滨25 mg/m²第1、8、15天。在同步放化疗阶段定义剂量限制性毒性(DLTs)。通过肺癌症状量表评估疾病相关症状。总共纳入24例患者,其中IIIB期(n = 12)和IV期疾病(n = 10)。最高给药剂量为DL4,长春瑞滨30 mg/m²+顺铂20 mg/m²,3例患者中有2例出现4级中性粒细胞减少的DLTs。未观察到3级或4级非血液学毒性。总体放射学缓解率为65%(n = 23:完全缓解4%,部分缓解61%),89%(n = 18)的患者在靶区内出现氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)反应。症状和生活质量得到改善或稳定。推荐DL3(长春瑞滨25 mg/m²+顺铂20 mg/m²)进行进一步评估。该方案耐受性良好,对需要局部区域控制但不适于根治性同步放化疗(CRT)的患者产生了有意义的反应。