Rossini David, Lucca Adelio, Zanardi Raffaella, Magri Lorenzo, Smeraldi Enrico
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, via Stamira d'Ancona 20, Milan 20127, Italy.
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Nov 15;137(1-2):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.06.008. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
This 5-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy and tolerability of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) directed to the left prefrontal cortex in drug-resistant depressed patients. Fifty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive 10 daily applications of either real or sham rTMS. Subjects assigned to receive active stimulation were divided into two further subgroups according to the intensity of stimulation: 80% vs. 100% of motor threshold (MT). At study completion, the response rates were 61.1% (n=11), 27.8% (n=5) and 6.2% (n=1) for the 100% MT group, 80% MT group and sham group, respectively. A significant difference (Pearson chi(2) test) was found between the 100% MT and sham groups, while the 80% MT group did not differ significantly from the sham group. Between the two active groups, a marginally significant difference was observed. Analysis of variance with repeated measures on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores revealed a significantly different decrease over time of depressive symptomatology among the three treatment groups. Treatment response appeared to be unrelated to the demographic and clinical characteristics recorded, and on the whole the technique was well tolerated. The results of this double-blind trial showed that rTMS may be a useful and safe adjunctive treatment for drug-resistant depressed patients.
这项为期5周的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验,研究了针对耐药性抑郁症患者左侧前额叶皮质的高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的疗效和耐受性。54名患者被随机分配,每天接受10次真正的或伪的rTMS治疗。根据刺激强度,接受积极刺激的受试者被进一步分为两个亚组:运动阈值(MT)的80%和100%。在研究结束时,100%MT组、80%MT组和伪刺激组的缓解率分别为61.1%(n = 11)、27.8%(n = 5)和6.2%(n = 1)。100%MT组和伪刺激组之间存在显著差异(Pearson卡方检验),而80%MT组与伪刺激组之间无显著差异。在两个积极治疗组之间,观察到轻微的显著差异。对汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分进行重复测量的方差分析显示,三个治疗组之间抑郁症状随时间的下降存在显著差异。治疗反应似乎与记录的人口统计学和临床特征无关,总体而言,该技术耐受性良好。这项双盲试验的结果表明,rTMS可能是耐药性抑郁症患者一种有用且安全的辅助治疗方法。