Hyett Jon A, Gardener Glenn, Stojilkovic-Mikic Taita, Finning Kirstin M, Martin Peter G, Rodeck Charles H, Chitty Lyn S
Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London, Chenies Mews, London, UK.
Prenat Diagn. 2005 Dec;25(12):1111-6. doi: 10.1002/pd.1284.
This study reviews our clinical experience of non-invasive techniques for early sex determination. It assesses the effectiveness of these techniques at reducing invasive prenatal testing for X-linked genetic disease or for ambiguous development of the external genitalia.
A prospective cohort study of 30 pregnancies was referred to a tertiary unit for prenatal diagnosis. Fetal gender was determined using two non-invasive techniques: analysis of free fetal DNA (ffDNA) in maternal plasma and ultrasound visualisation. The results were compared to fetal gender determined by invasive testing or at birth.
Fetal gender was accurately determined by analysis of ffDNA at a mean of 10 + 1 (7 + 6 to 14 + 1) weeks' gestation in all cases. Ultrasound assessment was accurate in 20 of the 23 cases where this was attempted at 12 + 0 (10 + 4 to 14 + 1) weeks' gestation, but could not be determined in the remaining 3 cases. Thirteen of 28 (46%) women chose not to have invasive testing on the basis of these findings.
Both the techniques appear to offer an accurate means of assessing fetal gender, giving parents the option of avoiding invasive testing in the 50% of cases where the fetus would not be affected. The molecular technique is performed at an earlier gestation, but female fetal status is predicted by a negative test result. Ultrasound cannot be applied until 11 weeks' gestation but diagnostic signs are sought in both sexes. Combining these approaches offers a highly sensitive method of non-invasive determination of gender in high-risk pregnancies. Health professionals, clinical geneticists and genetics associates, in particular, who refer women at high risk should be aware of these non-invasive options for prenatal sex determination.
本研究回顾了我们在早期性别鉴定非侵入性技术方面的临床经验。评估这些技术在减少针对X连锁遗传病或外生殖器发育不明确的侵入性产前检测方面的有效性。
对30例妊娠进行前瞻性队列研究,这些孕妇被转诊至三级医疗机构进行产前诊断。使用两种非侵入性技术确定胎儿性别:分析母血中游离胎儿DNA(ffDNA)和超声可视化。将结果与通过侵入性检测或出生时确定的胎儿性别进行比较。
在所有病例中,通过分析ffDNA在平均妊娠10 + 1(7 + 6至14 + 1)周时准确确定了胎儿性别。在妊娠12 + 0(10 + 4至14 + 1)周时尝试进行超声评估的23例病例中,20例评估准确,但其余3例无法确定。28名(46%)女性基于这些结果选择不进行侵入性检测。
这两种技术似乎都提供了一种准确的评估胎儿性别的方法,使父母能够在50%胎儿不受影响的情况下选择避免侵入性检测。分子技术在更早的孕周进行,但阴性检测结果预示胎儿为女性。超声直到妊娠11周才能应用,但对两性均寻找诊断体征。结合这些方法提供了一种在高危妊娠中高度敏感的非侵入性性别鉴定方法。特别是转诊高危女性的卫生专业人员、临床遗传学家和遗传学助理应了解这些非侵入性产前性别鉴定选项。