Schenk L, Neuhauser H
Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin.
Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Oct;67(10):719-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858655.
Migrants living in Germany are a both large and vulnerable population subgroup. They are not easily induced to participate in health surveys, Hence, achieving high participation rates of migrants in health surveys and avoiding selection bias is a difficult task. In this study, we report on the participation of migrants in the German National Health Telephone Survey 2003 (GSTel03), the first comprehensive national health survey conducted by telephone in Germany. Three migrant groups were identified: individuals with non-German citizenship (foreigners), naturalized migrants, and ethnic German immigrants (Spätaussiedler). The aim of this study is to evaluate the degree to which the GSTel03 subsample of foreigners is representative for foreigners living in Germany. We compare the prevalence of sociodemographic characteristics and selected health indicators of foreigners in the GNTel03 subsample with prevalences from national statistics and from a large national household survey ("Mikrozensus 2003"). The proportion of participants with non-German nationality in the overall GSTel03 sample was significantly lower than the proportion of foreigners in the residential population in Germany (3.7 % vs. 8.9 %). While there was no evidence of selection bias with regard to age and sex distribution, we found significant differences with regard to other factors, including nationality, length of stay in Germany, unemployment rate and education. The comparison of health indicators showed only moderate differences between GSTel03 sample and "Mikrozensus" results. However, these differences did not consistently point to a better or worse health status in the GSTel03 sample of foreigners and should therefore not be generalised in respect of other health indicators. Our study emphasises the importance of a continuous effort to improve migrant participation in health studies and of a thorough analysis of selection bias when interpreting results.
生活在德国的移民是一个庞大且脆弱的人口亚群体。他们不容易被说服参与健康调查。因此,要在健康调查中实现高移民参与率并避免选择偏倚是一项艰巨的任务。在本研究中,我们报告了移民参与2003年德国国民健康电话调查(GSTel03)的情况,这是德国首次通过电话进行的全面全国性健康调查。确定了三个移民群体:非德国公民(外国人)、入籍移民和德裔移民(“晚来定居者”)。本研究的目的是评估GSTel03中外国子样本对于生活在德国的外国人的代表性程度。我们将GNTel03子样本中外国人的社会人口学特征和选定的健康指标患病率与国家统计数据和一项大型全国性家庭调查(“2003年微观人口普查”)的患病率进行比较。GSTel03总体样本中具有非德国国籍的参与者比例显著低于德国常住人口中外国人的比例(3.7%对8.9%)。虽然在年龄和性别分布方面没有选择偏倚的证据,但我们发现其他因素存在显著差异,包括国籍、在德国的停留时间、失业率和教育程度。健康指标的比较显示,GSTel03样本与“微观人口普查”结果之间只有适度差异。然而,这些差异并没有一致地表明GSTel03外国子样本的健康状况更好或更差,因此不应就其他健康指标进行推广。我们的研究强调了持续努力提高移民参与健康研究的重要性,以及在解释结果时对选择偏倚进行深入分析的重要性。