Masiá Mar, Gutiérrez Félix, Shum Conrado, Padilla Sergio, Navarro Juan Carlos, Flores Emilio, Hernández Ildefonso
Infectious Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Camí de la Almazara S/N; 03203 ELCHE, Alicante, Spain.
Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2223-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2223.
To evaluate the usefulness of procalcitonin serum levels as a predictor of etiology and prognosis in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) when they are stratified according to severity.
One-year, population-based, prospective study.
University teaching hospital.
All adult patients who received a diagnosis of CAP throughout the study period.
An extensive noninvasive microbiological workup was performed. In patients who gave informed consent, a blood sample was collected at the time the diagnosis of CAP was established to measure biological markers. Procalcitonin levels were measured by a commercially available monoclonal immunoluminometric assay (limit of detection, 0.1 microg/L). Patients were classified according to microbial diagnosis, Patients Outcome Research Team pneumonia severity index (PSI), and outcome measures, and procalcitonin levels were compared among groups.
Of 240 patients who received a diagnosis of CAP during the study period, procalcitonin concentrations were measured in 185 patients (77.1%). Levels were higher in patients with high-severity risk classes (PSI classes III-V) [p = 0.01] and in those with complications (p = 0.03) or death (p < 0.0001). Among patients classified into PSI low-severity risk classes (classes I-II), levels tended to be higher in those with bacterial etiology (p = 0.08); in this group, a serum procalcitonin level > or = 0.15 microg/L was more frequently found in patients with bacterial pneumonia than in those with nonbacterial pneumonia (p = 0.03). In patients with higher-severity risk classes, no significant differences were observed in procalcitonin levels among etiologic groups, but higher concentrations were associated with development of complications (p = 0.01) and death (p < 0.0001).
Procalcitonin contribution to the evaluation of CAP varies according to severity. While procalcitonin may have a role to predict the microbial etiology in patients with a low PSI score, in patients classified within high PSI risk classes, it is a prognostic marker rather than a predictor of etiology.
评估降钙素原血清水平在根据严重程度分层的成年社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者中作为病因和预后预测指标的有用性。
基于人群的为期一年的前瞻性研究。
大学教学医院。
在整个研究期间被诊断为CAP的所有成年患者。
进行了广泛的非侵入性微生物学检查。在获得知情同意的患者中,在确立CAP诊断时采集血样以测量生物标志物。降钙素原水平通过市售的单克隆免疫发光测定法(检测限为0.1μg/L)进行测量。患者根据微生物诊断、患者预后研究团队肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)和预后指标进行分类,并比较各组的降钙素原水平。
在研究期间被诊断为CAP的240例患者中,185例(77.1%)测量了降钙素原浓度。高严重风险等级(PSI III-V级)患者的降钙素原水平更高[p = 0.01],有并发症(p = 0.03)或死亡(p < 0.0001)的患者也是如此。在被分类为PSI低严重风险等级(I-II级)的患者中,细菌病因患者的降钙素原水平往往更高(p = 0.08);在该组中,细菌性肺炎患者血清降钙素原水平≥0.15μg/L的情况比非细菌性肺炎患者更常见(p = 0.03)。在更高严重风险等级的患者中,各病因组之间降钙素原水平未观察到显著差异,但较高浓度与并发症的发生(p = 0.01)和死亡(p < 0.0001)相关。
降钙素原对CAP评估的作用因严重程度而异。虽然降钙素原可能在预测PSI评分低的患者的微生物病因方面有作用,但在被分类为高PSI风险等级的患者中,它是一个预后标志物而非病因预测指标。