Fujii Masahiro, Chambers David J
Cardiac Surgical Research/Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Rayne Institute, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Dec;28(6):821-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.06.048. Epub 2005 Oct 20.
Previously, we showed intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation afforded equivalent protection to cardioplegia. This study examined whether protection induced by intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation involves an ischemic preconditioning mechanism.
Isolated Langendorff-perfused rat hearts were subjected to three different studies to determine: Study 1, whether a single intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation episode (10 min) and reperfusion (10 min) before prolonged ischemia acts as a preconditioning trigger for protection; Study 2, whether cardioprotection induced by intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation alone (no prolonged ischemia) involves a preconditioning mechanism; Study 3, whether intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation cardioprotection can be prevented by targeting putative components of the preconditioning mechanism (protein kinase C or the mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium (K(ATP)) channel). Hearts were reperfused (60 min) and recovery of function (left ventricular developed pressure measured using an intraventricular balloon) and myocardial injury (creatine kinase leakage) were measured.
In Study 1, recovery of function in the single intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation hearts was 61+/-3% (mean+/-SEM) (p<0.05) compared to 41+/-2% in control group; glibenclamide (a non-specific ATP-sensitive potassium (K(ATP))-channel blocker) prevented this preconditioning protection (37+/-4%). In Study 2, recovery of function in intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation hearts (62+/-3%) was significantly (p<0.05) higher than intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation hearts treated with glibenclamide (33+/-2%) and ischemia hearts (30+/-5%). In Study 3, protection by intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation (60+/-3%; p<0.05) was attenuated by protein kinase C inhibition (chelerythrine, 34+/-3%) and mitochondrial K(ATP)-channel blockade (5-hydroxydecanoate, 27+/-4%) to levels not significantly different from that of ischemia hearts (25+/-4%).
The cardioprotective efficacy of intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation was attenuated by protein kinase C inhibition or K(ATP)-channel blockade. Involvement of these putative preconditioning cascade components in association with cardioprotection induced by intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation, suggests a role for the ischemic preconditioning mechanism.
此前,我们发现间歇性交叉夹闭致颤能提供与心脏停搏相当的保护作用。本研究旨在探讨间歇性交叉夹闭致颤所诱导的保护作用是否涉及缺血预处理机制。
对离体Langendorff灌注大鼠心脏进行三项不同研究以确定:研究1,长时间缺血前单次间歇性交叉夹闭致颤发作(10分钟)及再灌注(10分钟)是否作为预处理触发因素发挥保护作用;研究2,单独间歇性交叉夹闭致颤(无长时间缺血)所诱导的心脏保护作用是否涉及预处理机制;研究3,通过靶向预处理机制的假定成分(蛋白激酶C或线粒体ATP敏感性钾(K(ATP))通道)能否预防间歇性交叉夹闭致颤的心脏保护作用。心脏再灌注60分钟,并测量功能恢复情况(使用心室内球囊测量左心室舒张末压)及心肌损伤情况(肌酸激酶漏出)。
在研究1中,单次间歇性交叉夹闭致颤心脏的功能恢复率为61±3%(平均值±标准误)(p<0.05),而对照组为41±2%;格列本脲(一种非特异性ATP敏感性钾(K(ATP))通道阻滞剂)可预防这种预处理保护作用(37±4%)。在研究2中,间歇性交叉夹闭致颤心脏的功能恢复率(62±3%)显著高于(p<0.05)用格列本脲处理的间歇性交叉夹闭致颤心脏(33±2%)及缺血心脏(30±5%)。在研究3中,间歇性交叉夹闭致颤的保护作用(60±3%;p<0.05)因蛋白激酶C抑制(白屈菜红碱,34±3%)及线粒体K(ATP)通道阻断(5-羟基癸酸,27±4%)而减弱至与缺血心脏(25±4%)无显著差异的水平。
蛋白激酶C抑制或K(ATP)通道阻断可减弱间歇性交叉夹闭致颤的心脏保护效果。这些假定的预处理级联成分参与间歇性交叉夹闭致颤所诱导的心脏保护作用,提示缺血预处理机制发挥了作用。