Smaropoulos E C, Papazoglou L G, Patsikas M N, Vretou E, Petropoulos A S
Paediatric Surgery Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Oct;15(5):337-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865768.
Different types of trauma to the lymphatic system can often occur, but surgical intervention can be performed only in specific cases. We report on lymphatic regeneration following limb replantation in traumatic amputations and replantation of extremities. The aim of this study was to observe the progression and reaction after surgical trauma that is similar to other kinds of trauma, both in children or adults, and to monitor the possible lymphatic regeneration. Particular attention was paid to two parameters: firstly, the physical examination of the replanted limbs by checking the post-traumatic lymphoedema, and secondly, the study of the images taken from indirect lymphangiography of the replanted limbs. Histological specimens of the surgical trauma area were also examined to reconfirm or exclude lymphatic regeneration. The study population consisted of sixteen mongrel dogs, divided into two groups of eight animals each, who underwent hind limb elective amputation and replantation combined with (group A) or without (group B) sciatic nerve division. Lymphoedema formation was followed quantitatively by measurement of the circumference of the hind limb for 21 days after replantation. Indirect lymphography, never performed before in such cases, and histopathology, were performed to evaluate and confirm lymphatic regeneration. Lymphatic regeneration after replantation of the operated hind limbs was first confirmed between 7th and 11th postoperative day by indirect lymphangiography and clinical observation of the post-traumatic lymphoedema of these limbs. The mean time of visualisation of lymphatic regeneration through lymphography was 10.12 days for group A and 9.37 days for group B. However, nerve transection had no effect on lymphatic regeneration (p = 0.46). Histopathological examination showed first evidence of lymphatic regeneration on the ninth postoperative day and a network of newly formed capillary lymphatics on the 21st postoperative day. It is concluded that lymphatic regeneration following replantation of the extremities without anastomosing of the interrupted lymph vessels, is an unquestionable fact. To achieve the best lymphatic drainage and use of the replanted extremities it is important to resect all non-vital tissues of the replantation area. Local or general infections decelerate lymphatic regeneration. Indirect lymphography with iotrolan is a reliable, easy to perform technique without complications that may be used repeatedly for confirmation and evaluation of post-traumatic lymphoedema.
淋巴系统常可发生不同类型的创伤,但仅在特定情况下才能进行手术干预。我们报告了创伤性截肢和肢体再植术后肢体再植后的淋巴再生情况。本研究的目的是观察手术创伤后与其他类型创伤相似的进展和反应,包括儿童或成人,并监测可能的淋巴再生。特别关注两个参数:第一,通过检查创伤后淋巴水肿对再植肢体进行体格检查;第二,对再植肢体间接淋巴管造影所拍摄的图像进行研究。还检查了手术创伤区域的组织学标本,以再次确认或排除淋巴再生。研究对象为16只杂种犬,分为两组,每组8只,均接受后肢择期截肢和再植,其中一组(A组)同时进行坐骨神经切断,另一组(B组)不进行坐骨神经切断。再植后21天通过测量后肢周长对淋巴水肿形成进行定量跟踪。在这种情况下以前从未进行过间接淋巴管造影和组织病理学检查,以评估和确认淋巴再生。通过间接淋巴管造影和对这些肢体创伤后淋巴水肿的临床观察,首次在术后第7天至第11天确认了手术侧后肢再植后的淋巴再生。通过淋巴管造影观察到淋巴再生的平均时间,A组为10.12天,B组为9.37天。然而,神经切断对淋巴再生没有影响(p = 0.46)。组织病理学检查显示,术后第9天首次出现淋巴再生迹象,术后第21天出现新形成的毛细血管淋巴管网络。得出的结论是,在未吻合中断淋巴管的情况下进行肢体再植后淋巴再生是一个无可置疑的事实。为了实现最佳的淋巴引流和再植肢体的使用,切除再植区域的所有非重要组织很重要。局部或全身感染会减缓淋巴再生。使用碘曲仑进行间接淋巴管造影是一种可靠、易于操作且无并发症的技术,可反复用于确认和评估创伤后淋巴水肿。