Erhart M, Wetzel R, Krügel A, Ravens-Sieberer U
Forschungsgruppe Psychosoziale Gesundheit, Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, Germany.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Dec;48(12):1322-9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-005-1165-8.
Within a comprehensive comparison of telephone and postal survey methods the SF-8 was applied to assess adult's health-related quality of life. The 1690 subjects were randomly assigned to a telephone survey and a postal survey. Comparisons across the different modes of administration addressed the response rates, central tendency, deviation, ceiling and floor effects observed in the SF-8 scores as well as the inter-item correlation. The importance of age and gender as moderating factors was investigated. Results indicate no or small statistically significant differences in the responses to the SF-8 depending on the actual mode of administration and the health aspect questioned. It was concluded that further investigations should focus on the exact nature of these deviations and try to generate correction factors.
在对电话调查和邮寄调查方法进行全面比较的过程中,采用SF-8来评估成年人与健康相关的生活质量。1690名受试者被随机分配到电话调查和邮寄调查两组。针对不同调查方式进行的比较涉及SF-8得分的回复率、集中趋势、偏差、天花板效应和地板效应以及项目间相关性。研究了年龄和性别作为调节因素的重要性。结果表明,根据实际调查方式和所询问的健康方面内容,对SF-8的回答在统计学上不存在显著差异或仅有微小差异。得出的结论是,进一步的研究应关注这些偏差的确切性质,并尝试生成校正因子。