Merten Sonja, Dratva Julia, Ackermann-Liebrich Ursula
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e702-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0537.
In Switzerland, the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) proposed by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) was introduced in 1993 to promote breastfeeding nationwide. This study reports results of a national study of the prevalence and duration of breastfeeding in 2003 throughout Switzerland and analyzes the influence of compliance with UNICEF guidelines of the hospital where delivery took place on breastfeeding duration.
Between April and September 2003, a random sample of mothers who had given birth in the past 9 months in Switzerland received a questionnaire on breastfeeding and complementary feeding. Seventy-four percent of the contacted mothers (n = 3032) participated; they completed a 24-hour dietary recall questionnaire and reported the age at first introduction of various foods and drinks. After excluding questionnaires with missing information relevant for the analyses, we analyzed data for 2861 infants 0 to 11 months of age, born in 145 different health facilities. Because it was known whether each child was born in a designated baby-friendly hospital (45 hospitals) or in a health facility in the process of being evaluated for BFHI inclusion (31 facilities), we were able to assess a possible influence of the BFHI on breastfeeding success. For this purpose, we merged individual data with hospital data on compliance with the UNICEF guidelines, from a data source collected on an annual basis for quality monitoring of designated baby-friendly hospitals and health facilities in the evaluation process. Information on actual compliance with the guidelines allowed us to investigate the relationship between breastfeeding outcomes and compliance with UNICEF guidelines. We were also able to compare the breastfeeding results with those for non-baby-friendly health facilities. The comparison was based on median durations of exclusive, full, and any breastfeeding calculated for each group. To allow for other known influencing factors, we calculated adjusted hazard ratios by using Cox regression; we also conducted logistic regression analyses with the 24-hour dietary recall data, to calculate adjusted odds ratios for validation of results from the retrospectively collected data.
In 2003, the median duration of any breastfeeding was 31 weeks at the national level, compared with 22 weeks in 1994, and the median duration of full breastfeeding was 17 weeks, compared with 15 weeks in 1994. The proportion of exclusively breastfed infants 0 to 5 months of age was 42% for infants born in baby-friendly hospitals, compared with 34% for infants born elsewhere. Breastfeeding duration for infants born in baby-friendly hospitals, compared with infants born in other hospitals, was longer if the hospital showed good compliance with the UNICEF guidelines (35 weeks vs 29 weeks for any breastfeeding, 20 weeks vs 17 weeks for full breastfeeding, and 12 weeks vs 6 weeks for exclusive breastfeeding). To control for differences in the study population between the different types of health facilities, hazard and odds ratios were calculated as described above, taking into account socioeconomic and medical factors. Although the analysis of the retrospective data showed clearly that the duration of exclusive and full breastfeeding was significantly longer if delivery occurred in a baby-friendly hospital with high compliance with the UNICEF guidelines, whereas this effect was less prominent in other baby-friendly health facilities, this difference was less obvious in the 24-hour recall data. Only for the duration of any breastfeeding could a positive effect be seen if delivery occurred in a baby-friendly hospital with high compliance with the UNICEF guidelines. Known factors involved in the evaluation of baby-friendly hospitals showed the expected influence, on the individual level, on duration of exclusive, full, and any breastfeeding. If a child had been exclusively breastfed in the hospital, the median duration of exclusive, full, and any breastfeeding was considerably longer than the mean for the entire population or for those who had received water-based liquids or supplements in the hospital. A positive effect on breastfeeding duration could be shown for full rooming in, first suckling within 1 hour, breastfeeding on demand, and also the much-debated practice of pacifier use. After controlling for medical problems before, during, and after delivery, type of delivery, well-being of the mother, maternal smoking, maternal BMI, nationality, education, work, and income, all of the factors were still significantly associated with the duration of full, exclusive, or any breastfeeding.
Our results support the hypothesis that the general increase in breastfeeding in Switzerland since 1994 can be interpreted in part as a consequence of an increasing number of baby-friendly health facilities, whose clients breastfeed longer. Nevertheless, several alternative explanations for the longer breastfeeding duration for deliveries that occurred in baby-friendly hospitals can be discussed. In Switzerland, baby-friendly hospitals actively use their certification by UNICEF as a promotional asset. It is thus possible that differences in breastfeeding duration are attributable to the fact that mothers who intend to breastfeed longer would choose to give birth in a baby-friendly hospital and these mothers would be more willing to comply with the recommendations of the UNICEF guidelines. Even if this were the case, however, this selection bias would not explain the differences in breastfeeding duration between designated baby-friendly health facilities with higher compliance with the UNICEF guidelines and those with lower compliance. Especially this last point strongly supports a beneficial effect of the BFHI, because mothers do not know how well hospitals comply with the UNICEF program. The fact that breastfeeding rates have generally improved even in non-baby-friendly health facilities may be indirectly influenced by the BFHI; its publicity and training programs for health professionals have raised public awareness of the benefits of breastfeeding, and the number of professional lactation counselors has increased continuously. Breastfeeding prevalence and duration in Switzerland have improved in the past 10 years. Children born in a baby-friendly health facility are more likely to be breastfed for a longer time, particularly if the hospital shows high compliance with UNICEF guidelines. Therefore, the BFHI should be continued but should be extended to include monitoring for compliance, to promote the full effect of the BFHI.
在瑞士,联合国儿童基金会(UNICEF)提议的爱婴医院倡议(BFHI)于1993年引入,以在全国范围内促进母乳喂养。本研究报告了2003年瑞士全国母乳喂养患病率和持续时间的研究结果,并分析了分娩医院遵守UNICEF指南情况对母乳喂养持续时间的影响。
2003年4月至9月期间,对过去9个月内在瑞士分娩的母亲进行随机抽样,发放关于母乳喂养和辅食喂养的问卷。74%的受访母亲(n = 3032)参与了调查;她们完成了一份24小时饮食回顾问卷,并报告了首次引入各种食物和饮料的年龄。在排除与分析相关信息缺失的问卷后,我们分析了在145个不同医疗机构出生的2861名0至11个月婴儿的数据。由于已知每个孩子是在指定的爱婴医院(45家医院)出生,还是在正在接受BFHI纳入评估的医疗机构(31家机构)出生,我们能够评估BFHI对母乳喂养成功的可能影响。为此,我们将个体数据与医院遵守UNICEF指南的数据合并,这些数据来自每年收集的用于指定爱婴医院和评估过程中医疗机构质量监测的数据源。关于实际遵守指南的信息使我们能够研究母乳喂养结果与遵守UNICEF指南之间的关系。我们还能够将母乳喂养结果与非爱婴医疗机构的结果进行比较。比较基于为每组计算的纯母乳喂养、全母乳喂养和任何母乳喂养的中位数持续时间。为了考虑其他已知的影响因素,我们使用Cox回归计算调整后的风险比;我们还对24小时饮食回顾数据进行逻辑回归分析,以计算调整后的优势比,用于验证回顾性收集数据的结果。
在2003年,全国任何母乳喂养的中位数持续时间为31周,而1994年为22周;全母乳喂养的中位数持续时间为17周,而1994年为15周。在爱婴医院出生的0至5个月纯母乳喂养婴儿比例为42%,而在其他地方出生的婴儿为34%。与在其他医院出生的婴儿相比,如果医院对UNICEF指南的遵守情况良好,在爱婴医院出生的婴儿母乳喂养持续时间更长(任何母乳喂养为35周对29周,全母乳喂养为20周对17周,纯母乳喂养为12周对6周)。为了控制不同类型医疗机构研究人群的差异,如上所述,在考虑社会经济和医疗因素的情况下计算风险比和优势比。虽然对回顾性数据的分析清楚地表明,如果在高度遵守UNICEF指南的爱婴医院分娩,纯母乳喂养和全母乳喂养的持续时间明显更长,而在其他爱婴医疗机构这种效果不太显著,但在24小时回顾数据中这种差异不太明显。只有在高度遵守UNICEF指南的爱婴医院分娩时,才能看到对任何母乳喂养持续时间的积极影响。爱婴医院评估中涉及的已知因素在个体层面上对纯母乳喂养、全母乳喂养和任何母乳喂养的持续时间显示出预期的影响。如果孩子在医院进行了纯母乳喂养,纯母乳喂养、全母乳喂养和任何母乳喂养的中位数持续时间比整个人口或在医院接受了水性液体或补充剂的人的平均值长得多。母婴同室、1小时内首次吸吮、按需哺乳以及备受争议的使用安抚奶嘴的做法对母乳喂养持续时间有积极影响。在控制了分娩前、分娩期间和分娩后的医疗问题、分娩类型、母亲的健康状况、母亲吸烟、母亲BMI、国籍、教育程度、工作和收入后,所有这些因素仍然与全母乳喂养、纯母乳喂养或任何母乳喂养的持续时间显著相关。
我们的结果支持以下假设:自1994年以来瑞士母乳喂养的总体增加部分可以解释为越来越多的爱婴医疗机构的结果,这些机构的客户母乳喂养时间更长。然而,可以讨论在爱婴医院分娩母乳喂养持续时间更长的几种其他解释。在瑞士,爱婴医院积极将其获得UNICEF认证用作宣传资产。因此,母乳喂养持续时间的差异可能归因于打算更长时间母乳喂养的母亲会选择在爱婴医院分娩,并且这些母亲更愿意遵守UNICEF指南的建议。然而,即使情况如此,这种选择偏差也无法解释高度遵守UNICEF指南的指定爱婴医疗机构与遵守程度较低的机构之间母乳喂养持续时间的差异。特别是最后这一点有力地支持了BFHI的有益效果,因为母亲们不知道医院对UNICEF计划的遵守情况如何。即使在非爱婴医疗机构母乳喂养率总体上也有所提高这一事实可能受到BFHI的间接影响;其针对卫生专业人员的宣传和培训计划提高了公众对母乳喂养益处的认识,并且专业哺乳顾问的数量不断增加。在过去10年中,瑞士的母乳喂养患病率和持续时间有所改善。在爱婴医疗机构出生的儿童更有可能进行更长时间的母乳喂养,特别是如果医院对UNICEF指南的遵守程度很高。因此,应继续推行BFHI,但应扩大到包括对遵守情况的监测,以促进BFHI的全面效果。