Suppr超能文献

医护人员良心拒服的伦理与法律基础。

Ethical and juridical foundations of conscientious objection for health care workers.

作者信息

Gambino Gabriella, Spagnolo Antonio G

机构信息

Institute of Bioethics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, School of Medicine, Largo F. Vitto 1, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Med Etika Bioet. 2002 Spring-Summer;9(1-2):3-5.

Abstract

In front of the evolution of medicine and biotechnology, health care workers are called upon to take part within new biomedical practices, that may overcome the limit of acceptability, as it is perceived by their moral conscience. Issues as abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, artificial fertilisation, experimentation on human embryos and prescription of contraceptives and abortifacients call into play the right to conscientious objection of health care personnel, and in some cases, perhaps of physicians and pharmacists too. This recall--already present in many codes of professional conduct and medical ethics--sounds today as a necessity, which asks for a serious deepening of the content, the applicability and the new hypothesis of conscientious objection, in the light of bioethics and law. In particular, the self-determination and often exasperated autonomy of the patient within these practices makes a new principle of professional integrity arise, to protect the physician's conscientious convictions, if the request of the patient or society seem to violate some fundamental human values.

摘要

在医学和生物技术不断发展的背景下,医护人员被要求参与新的生物医学实践,这些实践可能会突破他们道德良知所感知的可接受性界限。诸如堕胎、安乐死、协助自杀、人工授精、人类胚胎实验以及避孕药和堕胎药的处方等问题,引发了医护人员基于良心拒服兵役的权利,在某些情况下,或许医生和药剂师也存在这一权利。这种要求——已出现在许多职业行为准则和医学伦理规范中——如今听起来很有必要,鉴于生物伦理学和法律,需要认真深入探讨良心拒服兵役的内容、适用性和新假设。特别是,在这些实践中患者的自我决定权以及常常过度的自主性,催生了一种新的职业操守原则,以保护医生基于良心的信念,前提是患者或社会的要求似乎违反了一些基本的人类价值观。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验