Aronsky Dominik, Haug Peter J, Lagor Charles, Dean Nathan C
Department of Biomedical Informatics & Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University, 2209 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Am J Med Qual. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):319-28. doi: 10.1177/1062860605280358.
The goal of this study was to determine the accuracy and the impact of 5 different claims-based pneumonia definitions. Three International Classification of Diseases, Version 9, (ICD-9), and 2 diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based case identification algorithms were compared against an independent, clinical pneumonia reference standard. Among 10748 patients, 272 (2.5%) had pneumonia verified by the reference standard. The sensitivity of claims-based algorithms ranged from 47.8% to 66.2%. The positive predictive values ranged from 72.6% to 80.8%. Patient-related variables were not significantly different from the reference standard among the 3 ICD-9-based algorithms. DRG-based algorithms had significantly lower hospital admission rates (57% and 65% vs 73.2%), lower 30-day mortality (5.0% and 5.8% vs 10.7%), shorter length of stay (3.9 and 4.1 days vs 5.6 days), and lower costs (USD $4543 and USD $5159 vs USD $8585). Claims-based identification algorithms for defining pneumonia in administrative databases are imprecise. ICD-9-based algorithms did not influence patient variables in our population. Identifying pneumonia patients with DRG codes is significantly less precise.
本研究的目的是确定5种基于索赔的肺炎定义的准确性及其影响。将3种国际疾病分类第9版(ICD-9)编码和2种基于诊断相关分组(DRG)的病例识别算法与一个独立的临床肺炎参考标准进行比较。在10748例患者中,有272例(2.5%)经参考标准证实患有肺炎。基于索赔的算法的敏感性在47.8%至66.2%之间。阳性预测值在72.6%至80.8%之间。在3种基于ICD-9的算法中,与患者相关的变量与参考标准相比无显著差异。基于DRG的算法的住院率显著更低(分别为57%和65%,而参考标准为73.2%),30天死亡率更低(分别为5.0%和5.8%,而参考标准为10.7%),住院时间更短(分别为3.9天和4.1天,而参考标准为5.6天),成本更低(分别为4543美元和5159美元,而参考标准为8585美元)。在行政数据库中用于定义肺炎的基于索赔的识别算法不准确。基于ICD-9的算法在我们的研究人群中未影响患者变量。使用DRG编码识别肺炎患者的准确性显著更低。