Ranjkesh Farzad, Barekatain Majid, Akuchakian Shahla
Department of Psychiatry, Noor University Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J ECT. 2005 Dec;21(4):207-10. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000187041.79087.59.
We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) methods: moderate-dose bifrontal, low-dose bitemporal, and high-dose right unilateral in the treatment of a major depressive episode.
In an 8-session, double-blinded parallel group study, 45 consecutive depressive patients who were referred for ECT to Noor Hospital were assigned randomly to bifrontal, moderate dose (50% above seizure threshold; n = 15); bitemporal, low dose (just above seizure threshold; n = 15); and right unilateral, high dose (400% above the seizure threshold; n = 15) ECT applications. Primary outcome measures included assessment by Mini-Mental State Examination and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
Thirty-nine of the patients completed the course of treatment. Two patients in bifrontal, 1 in bitemporal, and 3 in right unilateral dropped out of the study. The 3 groups did not show any difference in baseline characteristics. There was a significant difference between standardized Mini-Mental State scores of patients in bifrontal group compared with bitemporal and right unilateral patients (P < 0.05). The effectiveness of the 3 ECT methods, assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, did not show any significant difference (P > 0.05).
Moderate-dose bifrontal ECT revealed fewer cognitive side effects in comparison with bitemporal and right unilateral. Moderate-dose bifrontal ECT had the same efficacy compared with low-dose bitemporal and high-dose right unilateral in the treatment of depression.
我们试图评估三种电休克疗法(ECT):中度剂量双额叶、低剂量双侧颞叶和高剂量右侧单侧电休克疗法治疗重度抑郁发作的安全性和有效性。
在一项为期8个疗程的双盲平行组研究中,45名连续被转诊至努尔医院接受ECT治疗的抑郁症患者被随机分配接受双额叶、中度剂量(高于癫痫阈值50%;n = 15);双侧颞叶、低剂量(略高于癫痫阈值;n = 15);以及右侧单侧、高剂量(高于癫痫阈值400%;n = 15)的ECT治疗。主要结局指标包括简易精神状态检查表和汉密尔顿抑郁量表评估。
39名患者完成了治疗疗程。双额叶组有2名患者、双侧颞叶组有1名患者、右侧单侧组有3名患者退出研究。三组在基线特征方面未显示出任何差异。双额叶组患者的标准化简易精神状态评分与双侧颞叶组和右侧单侧组患者相比存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表评估,三种ECT方法的有效性未显示出任何显著差异(P > 0.05)。
与双侧颞叶和右侧单侧电休克疗法相比,中度剂量双额叶电休克疗法显示出较少的认知副作用。在治疗抑郁症方面,中度剂量双额叶电休克疗法与低剂量双侧颞叶和高剂量右侧单侧电休克疗法具有相同的疗效。