Dyer George S M, Vrahas Mark S
Harvard Combined Orthopaedics Residency, Boston, MA, USA.
Injury. 2006 Jul;37(7):602-13. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.09.007. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
Mortality following pelvic fractures has declined dramatically as better methods of controlling haemorrhage, such as angioembolisation to control arterial bleeding, have been introduced. But about 10% of patients still die, despite these advances. To save these patients, the key questions in managing pelvic fractures are: which patients are at highest risk for a life-threatening bleed, in these patients, what is the exact anatomical source of the bleeding and what is the best way to stop it? There is wide consensus that bleeding is most likely to occur with unstable fractures. However, it remains difficult to predict which fractures will actually cause excessive bleeding. Current treatment protocols rely on angiographic embolisation and external fixation, either alone or in combination. Direct pelvic packing is gaining in popularity, but, ultimately, the ideal treatment method remains unclear. The purpose of this review is to examine our current understanding of the pathophysiology and management of bleeding pelvic fractures.
随着更好的控制出血方法的引入,如通过血管栓塞来控制动脉出血,骨盆骨折后的死亡率已大幅下降。但尽管有这些进展,仍有大约10%的患者死亡。为了挽救这些患者,骨盆骨折治疗中的关键问题是:哪些患者面临危及生命出血的风险最高,在这些患者中,出血的确切解剖学来源是什么,以及止血的最佳方法是什么?人们普遍认为,不稳定骨折最容易发生出血。然而,预测哪些骨折实际上会导致大量出血仍然很困难。目前的治疗方案依赖于血管造影栓塞和外固定,单独使用或联合使用。直接骨盆填塞越来越受欢迎,但最终,理想的治疗方法仍不明确。本综述的目的是审视我们目前对骨盆骨折出血的病理生理学和治疗的理解。