Suppr超能文献

一种使用近端等速表面积(PISA)测量二尖瓣面积的简单不同方法。

A simple different method to use proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) for measuring mitral valve area.

作者信息

Uzun Mehmet, Baysan Oben, Erinc Kursad, Ozkan Mustafa, Sag Cemal, Genc Celal, Karaeren Hayrettin, Yokusoglu Mehmet, Isik Ersoy

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2005 Dec;21(6):633-40. doi: 10.1007/s10554-005-4709-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angle-correction is an important limiting factor for using proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method in measuring mitral valve area (MVA). In this study, we derived a novel formula, which simplifies the angle-correction, and tested its use in patients with mitral stenosis (MS).

METHODS

The study included 30 MS patients without concomitant aortic or mitral regurgitation. We used mathematical equations and established a relation between the angle and its corresponding border, 'a', by using linear regression analysis. It was found that MVA is equal to [(1.11a2 + 0.95) r2 (Val/Vmax)]. We compared this formula with plain angle-corrected and solid angle-corrected PISA methods, planimetry (reference method) and pressure-half time method by linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

All methods were in significant relation with the reference method, two-dimensional planimetry. We found that there is a good relation between our method and planimetry (r = 0.79, p < 0.001), pressure half-time method (r = 0.85, p < 0.001), angle-corrected PISA method (r = 0.99, p < 0.001), and solid angle-corrected PISA method (r = 0.88, p < 0.001). The time duration of the new method was shorter (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our method is an easy way for applying angle-corrected PISA method to mitral valve area measurement in patients with mitral stenosis. Absence of the need for estimating the angle is the major advantage.

摘要

背景

角度校正对于使用近端等速表面积(PISA)法测量二尖瓣面积(MVA)而言是一个重要的限制因素。在本研究中,我们推导了一个简化角度校正的新公式,并在二尖瓣狭窄(MS)患者中对其应用进行了测试。

方法

该研究纳入了30例无主动脉或二尖瓣反流的MS患者。我们使用数学方程,并通过线性回归分析建立了角度与其相应边界“a”之间的关系。结果发现MVA等于[(1.11×a² + 0.95)×r²(Val/Vmax)]。我们通过线性回归分析将该公式与普通角度校正和立体角校正的PISA法、平面测量法(参考方法)及压力减半时间法进行了比较。

结果

所有方法均与参考方法二维平面测量法存在显著相关性。我们发现我们的方法与平面测量法(r = 0.79,p < 0.001)、压力减半时间法(r = 0.85,p < 0.001)、角度校正PISA法(r = 0.99,p < 0.001)及立体角校正PISA法(r = 0.88,p < 0.001)之间均存在良好的相关性。新方法的测量时间更短(p < 0.001)。

结论

我们的方法是在二尖瓣狭窄患者中应用角度校正PISA法测量二尖瓣面积的简便方法。无需估计角度是其主要优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验