Koopmans Gerrit T, Lamers Leida M
Department of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Medical Center, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;40(12):1012-8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0957-3. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
The aim of this study is to compare three indicators of psychological distress (PD) on the strength of their association with subjective (or perceived) health and to analyse to what extent these associations will change after adjusting for physical illness measures and other possible confounding variables.
Data were used from a community-based sample of adults (N=9,428). Psychological distress was measured using three different instruments: the Negative Affect Scale of Bradburn, a nervousness scale, and a self-reported depressive complaints. Physical illness was measured by seven specific chronic conditions, a co-morbidity index of 17 conditions and two disability measures. Subjective health was assessed by a single question. Ordinary least square and logistic regression as well as structural equation modelling were used to analyse the data.
The relation between subjective health and PD is strongest in case nervousness and this, or negative affect, are used as indicators of PD. The measure of depressive complaints is less strongly, but still substantially, related to subjective health. After correction for physical illness variables, the change in strength of the association is slightest for depressive complaints and highest for nervousness. Only small differences between negative affect and nervousness were established. These measures, which were more contaminated by physical ill health than depressive complaints, have the strongest association with subjective health both before as well as after correction for physical illness components.
Negative affect and nervousness are reliable and valid indicators of PD, which can be used to predict subjective health. However, for this purpose, a correction for the confounding effects of physical illness variables will be necessary. The depressive complaints measure is not only less predictive of subjective health but also less contaminated by physical illness variables, making it a better indicator of PD if correction for physical illness variables is not possible.
本研究旨在比较三种心理困扰(PD)指标与主观(或感知)健康之间关联的强度,并分析在调整身体疾病测量指标和其他可能的混杂变量后,这些关联会在多大程度上发生变化。
数据来自一个基于社区的成人样本(N = 9428)。使用三种不同的工具测量心理困扰:布拉德伯恩消极情感量表、紧张量表和自我报告的抑郁症状。通过七种特定的慢性病、17种疾病的共病指数和两种残疾测量指标来衡量身体疾病。通过一个单一问题评估主观健康。使用普通最小二乘法、逻辑回归以及结构方程模型来分析数据。
在将紧张或消极情感用作PD指标的情况下,主观健康与PD之间的关系最强。抑郁症状测量指标与主观健康的关联较弱,但仍很显著。在对身体疾病变量进行校正后,抑郁症状关联强度的变化最小,紧张的变化最大。消极情感和紧张之间仅存在微小差异。这些指标比抑郁症状更容易受到身体不健康的影响,在对身体疾病成分进行校正之前和之后,它们与主观健康的关联都最强。
消极情感和紧张是PD的可靠有效指标,可用于预测主观健康。然而,为此目的,有必要对身体疾病变量的混杂效应进行校正。抑郁症状测量指标不仅对主观健康的预测性较低,而且受身体疾病变量的影响较小,如果无法对身体疾病变量进行校正,它将是PD的一个更好指标。