Declerck P, Behets J, Delaedt Y, Margineanu A, Lammertyn E, Ollevier F
Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Zoological Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Charles De Bériotstraat 32, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Microb Ecol. 2005 Nov;50(4):536-49. doi: 10.1007/s00248-005-0258-0. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
In aquatic environments, Legionella pneumophila survives, in association with other bacteria, within biofilms by multiplying in free-living amoebae. The precise mechanisms underlying several aspects of the uptake and intracellular replication of L. pneumophila in amoebae, especially in the presence of other bacteria, remain unknown. In the present study, we examined the competitive effect of selected non-Legionella bacteria (Escherichia coli, Aeromonas hydrophila, Flavobacterium breve, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) on the uptake of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 by the amoebae Acanthamoeba castellanii and Naegleria lovaniensis. We also investigated their possible influence on the intracellular replication of L. pneumophila in both amoeba species. Our results showed that the non-Legionella bacteria did not compete with L. pneumophila for uptake, suggesting that the amoeba hosts took in L. pneumophila through a specific and presumably highly efficient uptake mechanism. Living and heat-inactivated P. aeruginosa best supported the replication of L. pneumophila in N. lovaniensis and A. castellanii, respectively, whereas for both amoeba species, E. coli yielded the lowest number of replicated L. pneumophila. Furthermore, microscopic examination showed that 100% of the A. castellanii and only 2% of the N. lovaniensis population were infected with L. pneumophila at the end of the experiment. This study clearly shows the influence of some non-Legionella bacteria on the intracellular replication of L. pneumophila in A. castellanii and N. lovaniensis. It also demonstrates the different abilities of the two tested amoeba species to serve as a proper host for the replication and distribution of the human pathogen in man-made aquatic environments such as cooling towers, shower heads, and air conditioning systems with potential serious consequences for human health.
在水生环境中,嗜肺军团菌与其他细菌一起,通过在自由生活的变形虫中繁殖而在生物膜内存活。嗜肺军团菌在变形虫中摄取和细胞内复制的几个方面,特别是在其他细菌存在的情况下,其确切机制仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们检测了选定的非军团菌(大肠杆菌、嗜水气单胞菌、短黄杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌)对卡氏棘阿米巴和洛万内氏耐格里阿米巴摄取嗜肺军团菌血清型1的竞争作用。我们还研究了它们对嗜肺军团菌在这两种变形虫中细胞内复制的可能影响。我们的结果表明,非军团菌与嗜肺军团菌在摄取方面不存在竞争,这表明变形虫宿主通过一种特定且可能高效的摄取机制摄取嗜肺军团菌。活的和热灭活的铜绿假单胞菌分别最有利于嗜肺军团菌在洛万内氏耐格里阿米巴和卡氏棘阿米巴中的复制,而对于这两种变形虫,大肠杆菌产生的嗜肺军团菌复制数量最低。此外,显微镜检查显示,在实验结束时,100%的卡氏棘阿米巴和仅2%的洛万内氏耐格里阿米巴群体感染了嗜肺军团菌。这项研究清楚地表明了一些非军团菌对嗜肺军团菌在卡氏棘阿米巴和洛万内氏耐格里阿米巴中细胞内复制的影响。它还证明了两种受试变形虫作为人类病原体在冷却塔、淋浴喷头和空调系统等人造水生环境中复制和传播的合适宿主的不同能力,这可能对人类健康造成严重后果。